Why I Take Angel Funding over VCs
visual.ly
Why I Take Angel Funding over VCs
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Why I Take Angel Funding over VCs
#2Re: Why I Take Angel Funding over VCs
#3Re: Why I Take Angel Funding over VCs
#4That is a needless and horrible infographic.
Re: Why I Take Angel Funding over VCs
#5Re: Why I Take Angel Funding over VCs
#6Link: http://www.sec.gov/answers/accred.htm Link2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accredited_investor
Re: Why I Take Angel Funding over VCs
#7But none of these appear to be to scale. So they're completely misleading.
May Tufte have mercy on your soul.
Re: Why I Take Angel Funding over VCs
#8Am I misinterpreting the data when it says Avg. Angel income of $90K and Avg. net worth of $750K since that would make the "Avg." angel in their list a non-accredited investor and hence not an angel from who you should raise money since you will lose your Reg-D exemptions. The min requirement for an Accredited investor is a minimum annual income of $200K (or $300K with spouse if married) and/or a net worth of $1milli…
It's complicated, but the exemptions generally apply to the majority of equity offerings. It is usually only a problem when you are attempting to publicly offer equity. This was the primary obstacle to crowdfunding until the Crowdfunding Act was passed earlier this year.