191–200 of 1001 posts
Extra respect is due to Jan Leike, then: https://x.com/janleike/status/1791498174659715494
Idk. Folks much smarter than I seem worried so maybe I should be too but it just seems like such a long shot.
Why have other companies not done the same? This seems legally tenuous to only now be attempted. Will we see burger flippers prevented from discussing the rat infestation at their previous workplace? (Don’t have X) - is there a timeline? Can I curse out the company on my deathbed, or would their lawyers have the legal right to try and clawback the equity from the estate?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Talking to a lawyer is **never** bad advice. Especially in CA where companies will make you THINK they have power which they don’t.
Talking to good, honest lawyers is a good idea. Unfortunately most people don't have access to good honest lawyers, or don't know how to distinguish them from crooks with law degrees.
Extra respect is due to Jan Leike, then: https://x.com/janleike/status/1791498174659715494
Reading that thread it’s really interesting to me. I see how far we’ve come in a short couple of years. But I still can’t grasp how we’ll achieve AGI within any reasonable amount of time. It just seems like we’re missing some really critical… something… Idk. Folks much smarter than I seem worried so maybe I should be too but it just seems like such a long shot.
So yes, the insiders very likely know a thing or two that the rest of us don’t.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
somebody explained to me early on that you cannot have a contract to have a contract. either initial agreement must state this condition clearly or they are signing another contract at employment termination which is bringing these new terms. IDK why would anyone sign that at termination unless they dangle additional equity. I dont think this BS they are trying to pull would be enforceable at least in California. tho…
Canceling my openai subscription as we speak, this is too much. I don't care how good it is relative to other offerings. Not worth it.
Totally normal, nothing to see here. Keep building your disruptive, game-changing, YC-applicant startup on the APIs of this sociopathic corporation whose products are destined to destroy all trust humans have in other humans so that everyone can be replaced by chatbots. It's all fine. Everything's fine.
You don’t think the claim that “everyone can be replaced by chatbots” is a bit outrageous? Do you really believe this or is it just hyperbole?
What's one more hyperbole?
Edit to add, provocatively but not sarcastically: next time you hear some AI-proponent-who-used-to-be-a-crypto-proponent roll out the "but aren't we all just LLMs, in essence?" justification for their belief that ChatGPT may have broad understanding, ask yourself: are they not just self-soothing over their part in mass job losses with a nice faux-scientific-inevitability bedtime story?