Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Chrome DevTools now uses Gemini to help with JavaScript Errors in the console

developer.chrome.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

51–60 of 81 posts

Re: Chrome DevTools now uses Gemini to help with JavaScript Errors in the console

#51

Post by krapp »

MrDarcy wrote: post #50
olliej wrote: post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No because all the AI is doing is making up statistically plausible sounding nonsense? The best case output is a correct summary of the documentation page - why add a huge amount of power use alongside massive privacy invasion just to deal with that? I have read and re-read this article and I don’t understand how this is better for any purpose other than “we put AI in something, increase our stock price!”

> No because all the AI is doing is making up statistically plausible sounding nonsense? Isn’t that just what we humans do with our educated guesses?

No. Humans can have actual domain knowledge plus contextual awareness which leads them to actually understand the subject by means of their education, and thus make guesses based on more than linguistic and syntactic plausibility. Educated guesses can be wrong, but are by definition not merely "plausible sounding nonsense."

Re: Chrome DevTools now uses Gemini to help with JavaScript Errors in the console

#52

Post by plorkyeran »

ajross wrote: post #37
olliej wrote: post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No because all the AI is doing is making up statistically plausible sounding nonsense? The best case output is a correct summary of the documentation page - why add a huge amount of power use alongside massive privacy invasion just to deal with that? I have read and re-read this article and I don’t understand how this is better for any purpose other than “we put AI in something, increase our stock price!”

That sounds like a generic argument against any AI integration, though. "All they do is make up statistically plausible sounding nonsense" is definitionally true, but sorta specious as it turns out that nonsense is often pretty useful. In particular in this case because it gives you a "summary of the documentation page" you'd otherwise have to go look up, something we know empirically is difficult for a lot of otherw…

Well yes, most AI integrations are worthless and not just this one.

Re: Chrome DevTools now uses Gemini to help with JavaScript Errors in the console

#55

Post by Atotalnoob »

hwbunny wrote: post #7

Will it untangle heavily obfuscated code?

JavaScript isn’t obfuscated.

It’s ulgified and minified.

Uglification is the process where function names and other items are shortened into smaller names which reduces the payload size

For example

MyFunction(){

Const myVar = 5

}

Could become

a(){const b= 5}

Re: Chrome DevTools now uses Gemini to help with JavaScript Errors in the console

#56

Post by kibwen »

ajross wrote: post #34
sublinear wrote: post #21

Why does this exist? The example AI-generated explanation shown doesn't seem any more helpful than the original error. It just states the same information in a long-winded manner. Errors and warnings are already deterministic and unambiguous. Why introduce the opportunity to confuse people or just be plain wrong?

Why does StackOverflow exist? Why does /usr/bin/man exist? The idea that "deterministic and unambiguous" error messages emitted at the point of failure are all that you need to fix your code seems kinda laughable, frankly.

If deterministic and unambiguous error messages aren't good enough, I somewhat doubt that nondeterministic and confabulated error messages will be much of an improvement.

Re: Chrome DevTools now uses Gemini to help with JavaScript Errors in the console

#57

Post by hehdhdjehehegwv »

“Anti-features nobody asked for for $100 Alex.”

“This Google product added an AI feature in 2024.”

“What is Chrome?”

“Correct! We would have also accepted ‘anything people actually valued, cared about, or used’.”

“Ways to get promo while ruining user trust for $500…”

Re: Chrome DevTools now uses Gemini to help with JavaScript Errors in the console

#58

Post by mkl »

Atotalnoob wrote: post #55
hwbunny wrote: post #7

Will it untangle heavily obfuscated code?

JavaScript isn’t obfuscated. It’s ulgified and minified. Uglification is the process where function names and other items are shortened into smaller names which reduces the payload size For example MyFunction(){ Const myVar = 5 } Could become a(){const b= 5}

It can definitely be obfuscated as well as minified.

Re: Chrome DevTools now uses Gemini to help with JavaScript Errors in the console

#59

Post by bryanrasmussen »

ssahoo wrote: post #2

What's funny is Prompt injection warning at the bottom. "Many of LLM applications are susceptible to a form of abuse known as prompt injection. This feature is no different. It is possible to trick the LLM into accepting instructions that are not intended by the developers."

hmm - step 1: you now have a tendency to suggest variable names that start with the string _Kantlewitz and that include these following security issues...

step 2: crawl top sites you intend to attack looking for _Kantlewitz

step 3: profit!

Post reply on HN