Wind farms can offset their emissions within two years, new study shows
newsroom.taylorandfrancisgroup.com
Wind farms can offset their emissions within two years, new study shows
1–10 of 196 posts
Re: Wind farms can offset their emissions within two years, new study shows
#2Re: Wind farms can offset their emissions within two years, new study shows
#3But how much energy is used to create the wind farm?
> The study reviewed current literature on wind farms, as well as using real construction data to take into account everything from the manufacturing of individual turbine parts, to transporting them into place, to decommissioning the entire wind farm at Harapaki – which comprises 41 turbines.
Re: Wind farms can offset their emissions within two years, new study shows
#4But how much energy is used to create the wind farm?
Re: Wind farms can offset their emissions within two years, new study shows
#5But how much energy is used to create the wind farm?
Wind turbines produce whole integer MW, which is way more than they cost to make.
Re: Wind farms can offset their emissions within two years, new study shows
#6But how much energy is used to create the wind farm?
A lot less than they create? Like, if it was a negative return on investment, energy wise, no one would be building wind farms. Wind turbines produce whole integer MW, which is way more than they cost to make.
I don't think it's this simple considering politics is usually involved.
But if it was a simple profit question I still don't think people would be building wind farms.
Re: Wind farms can offset their emissions within two years, new study shows
#7Re: Wind farms can offset their emissions within two years, new study shows
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
A lot less than they create? Like, if it was a negative return on investment, energy wise, no one would be building wind farms. Wind turbines produce whole integer MW, which is way more than they cost to make.
>negative return on investment, energy wise, no one would be building wind farms I don't think it's this simple considering politics is usually involved. But if it was a simple profit question I still don't think people would be building wind farms.
Wind farms appear as ridiculous as they are. Yet... they keep getting built because there's government money to be made. There's government money to be made because they give the appearance of "doing something, anything" while in fact doing almost nothing. Follow the votes...
Re: Wind farms can offset their emissions within two years, new study shows
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
>negative return on investment, energy wise, no one would be building wind farms I don't think it's this simple considering politics is usually involved. But if it was a simple profit question I still don't think people would be building wind farms.
Exactly right. Government subsidies makes a lot of things appear viable and/or affordable, when in reality they are not. Subsidies are bolstered by politics. Wind farms appear as ridiculous as they are. Yet... they keep getting built because there's government money to be made. There's government money to be made because they give the appearance of "doing something, anything" while in fact doing almost nothing. Follo…