Live data from Hacker News

The most confusing emojis in every US state in 2024

preply.com

41–50 of 61 posts

Re: The most confusing emojis in every US state in 2024

#41
I had a candidate apply for a role and in his comms with our female recruiter sent a fairly ambiguous response and finished it up with the nail polish emoji.

That definitely ended his candidacy.

Not sure exactly what it meant, but couldn’t think of a good explanation for it.

Re: The most confusing emojis in every US state in 2024

#42
Always dreaded having to explain things like the thumbs up emoji or ship it squirrel to regulators, auditors, compliance and how that technically meets the change policy definition of “approved by senior technology leadership in writing on a ticket” if they put it on a release request or PR.

Re: The most confusing emojis in every US state in 2024

#43
A lot of emoji use is just slang. Just like regular word language. “that’s cool”, “that’s hot”—these can mean the same thing. Slang is also subcultural. :skull: won’t make sense to a 60+ year old man.

Another use is just to tack on to sentences like a little pizzaz. I’m going to the doctor :hospital:

Another common use is to soften formal-sounding written-only language. A lot of relatively older people don’t get or think about how their regular-ass sentence writing in informal contexts sounds stiff, angry, or even passive-aggressive to some younger people. Like writing a chat message with a period at the end? That can come off as very passive-aggressive. (See how even regular, grammatical, perfectly HN-approved (no emoticons) can have a tone even without any snark?) So if you have to write a sentence at the end? A smiley can soften that.

The ambiguity can also be intended. We all write for different people. We don’t intend to communicate perfectly. Some ambiguity is often good (in our opinion). One of the emoticons is interpreted by some as passive-aggressive, but far from all. That sounds like a great thing for a passive-aggressive person: plausible deniability.

People that dislike emojis and who also like to communicate clearly (perhaps to a fault) can take heart that some of the slang-energy is diverted into symbols. Now your regular-ass words are less likely to take on new, bewildering meanings.

Re: The most confusing emojis in every US state in 2024

#46
post #21

>> rebelled-against emojis, meaning the emojis that people use for different meanings than what their title suggests they mean. The top emoji people don’t use as intended is the persevering face, with only 5% using it as intended and the majority using it to signify frustration I’m willing to bet money that less than 5% of the people using the Eggplant emoji actually mean eggplant.

[dead]

Re: The most confusing emojis in every US state in 2024

#47
For newer emoji, if you want to know how it was originally supposed they might be used, you can look up the proposal to the Unicode Consortium for its inclusion.[1] Some of them are quite fun to read. Unfortunately Unicode's page is currently loading like I'm on 28k dial-up and you have to wait for it to get down to the one you want.

The old ones like "Nail Polish" were also proposed in large groups and don't have a special document just for themselves. But new ones do, for example:

"Dotted-line face": https://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetDocumentLink?L2/20-223

"Head shaking horizontally": https://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetDocumentLink?L2/23-034

"Phoenix": https://www.unicode.org/cgi-bin/GetDocumentLink?L2/23-033

[1] https://www.unicode.org/emoji/charts/emoji-proposals.html

Re: The most confusing emojis in every US state in 2024

#48
post #4

A huge percentage (most?) emojis are unhelpful precisely because their meanings are unclear. If they're from someone I've interacted with enough then I learn how to decipher what they mean by different ones, but if I've not then it's too risky to try and guess. This aspect of emojis is why I dislike them.

[dead]

Re: The most confusing emojis in every US state in 2024

#49
If the common appearance of an emoji doesn't match its Unicode description, it can happen that we permanently "lose" certain emojis. For example, I once wondered why there is no "pouting face" emoji. There is one in the Unicode standard, but Apple decided to implement it as "red angry face" (even though there already was an angry face), and everyone followed suit. The end.
Post reply on HN