State of the Terminal
gpanders.com
State of the Terminal
1–10 of 159 posts
Re: State of the Terminal
#2Currently, if you like visuals and want super fast experience, one easy (my favorite) setup is to install neovim, nvchad.com and (as extra neovide.dev)
Re: State of the Terminal
#3As an application author, I love being able to assume that all major platforms have a good terminal and that my favorite terminal rendering libraries should Just Work on all of them
Re: State of the Terminal
#4This is such an understatement. Alacritty required you to manually bind keys to control characters in the config and finding the control characters escape sequences were such a nightmare I gave up and switched to foot
Re: State of the Terminal
#5I think it stems from its simplicity and logic.
You have a simple grid of characters. You type the name of a program, hit enter, and the computer executes it. The output of the program is written below your prompt. Below the output, you can execute the next program. You can chain output and input of programs, allowing all kinds of data flows. The programs can also take over the whole grid and thereby allow all kinds of interfaces.
I can't think of a way to describe a window manager or a browser in similar, simple terms, which would explain the basis of all the usefulness they bring.
Re: State of the Terminal
#6Re: State of the Terminal
#7A quick off-the-cuff remark based solely on the title: in 2024, I think the state of the terminal has never been better, in large part to Microsoft making a high quality terminal easily available to everyone on Windows [1] As an application author, I love being able to assume that all major platforms have a good terminal and that my favorite terminal rendering libraries should Just Work on all of them [1] https://git…
Re: State of the Terminal
#8The terminal is such a wonderful environment. It makes many tasks joyful. I think it stems from its simplicity and logic. You have a simple grid of characters. You type the name of a program, hit enter, and the computer executes it. The output of the program is written below your prompt. Below the output, you can execute the next program. You can chain output and input of programs, allowing all kinds of data flows. T…
I wonder if we could eventually make a "new term" which shares the same foundation, but atop a rich rendered experience. A GUI written with simple primitives (that could also probably be rendered as TUI, frankly), but with slightly more slick (and expensive lol) rendering.
I know, i know - blasphemy, i'm sorry. But despite my love for the Term (i've been in it for ~15 years now) i long for _slightly improved_ graphics.
Re: State of the Terminal
#9https://github.com/bennetyee/TekGraphics
Here's an emulator for those specific real terminals: https://github.com/rricharz/Tek4010
Re: State of the Terminal
#10The terminal is such a wonderful environment. It makes many tasks joyful. I think it stems from its simplicity and logic. You have a simple grid of characters. You type the name of a program, hit enter, and the computer executes it. The output of the program is written below your prompt. Below the output, you can execute the next program. You can chain output and input of programs, allowing all kinds of data flows. T…
Agreed. My only real problem is that font size and "UI" size (gutters/etc) being tied feels like an accessibility tax. Aside from that, they're wonderful. I wonder if we could eventually make a "new term" which shares the same foundation, but atop a rich rendered experience. A GUI written with simple primitives (that could also probably be rendered as TUI, frankly), but with slightly more slick (and expensive lol) re…