My VM is lighter (and safer) than your container (2017)
1–10 of 184 posts
Re: My VM is lighter (and safer) than your container (2017)
#2Re: My VM is lighter (and safer) than your container (2017)
#3Re: My VM is lighter (and safer) than your container (2017)
#4Re: My VM is lighter (and safer) than your container (2017)
#5Re: My VM is lighter (and safer) than your container (2017)
#6Integrate that with kubernetes and I'm sold.
Re: My VM is lighter (and safer) than your container (2017)
#7Integrate that with kubernetes and I'm sold.
What, like https://firecracker-microvm.github.io/ ?
Funnily that's what fly does: take your container uncompress it to a full micro VM and run it on their infra
Re: My VM is lighter (and safer) than your container (2017)
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
What, like https://firecracker-microvm.github.io/ ?
I think it's from the AWS team, they made firecracker (micro VM) So it does exist. Funnily that's what fly does: take your container uncompress it to a full micro VM and run it on their infra
Re: My VM is lighter (and safer) than your container (2017)
#9If there is some additional isolation required, just run the container in a VM.
Re: My VM is lighter (and safer) than your container (2017)
#10Integrate that with kubernetes and I'm sold.
I'm wondering though what value will Kubernetes add beside integrating with existing (presumably Kubernetes-based) infrastructure? At least, this is my understanding of the rationale for Kata containers. Other than that, it seems like it'd be just getting in the way...