I don’t think I got a single spam email in the last 5-10 years.
SMS, on the other hand…
41–50 of 180 posts
I don’t think I got a single spam email in the last 5-10 years.
SMS, on the other hand…
> even when a human visitor has their JavaScript turned off, the email address displayed on the page remains usable NoScript on Firefox with default settings don't render tags (replaces them with placeholders), so this technique doesn't work here. https://imgur.com/2tCAgAf
[flagged]
(When did you see a site that only worked in Firefox, or only in Safari?)
I’ve been using the same gmail address for like 20 years. I don’t think I got a single spam email in the last 5-10 years. SMS, on the other hand…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you self-host your email, you can use "." as a delimiter instead of the "+". People would already need to know they can strip that part...
Sounds good! I might go even further and just use a custom address for each service, i.e. paypal@example.com or something. But self-hosting email is an adventure I'm nervous to embark on.
Which is exactly what I do. As soon as I see spam sent to any particular email address, I know who it is that leaked the address and I can block it without issue.
>But self-hosting email is an adventure I'm nervous to embark on.
Why are you nervous about it? I've been doing so for decades and haven't had many issues at all. There are a bunch of all-in-one solutions like mailinabox[0] (I roll my own, but as I said, I've been doing this for decades) and others which would likely make things simpler for you. Go for it! You won't be disappointed.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
The idea being that spam bots don't parse svg's looking for email addresses, just the page html. I'm not sure how effective this really is with modern spam protection, however.
The idea also seem to be that spam bots don’t look for `href="mailto:something"` in the DOM
Don't have time to test myself right now - what about accessibility, can a screen reader read it?
I tested and seems accessible on the live demo. Not sure if is as protected as the author claims though, but it might throw some bots for a spin.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
This is appropriate advice for the average HN reader. For everyone else, probably not. I've seen first hand otherwise intelligent people being unable to discern an obvious (to me) online scam from a legitimate business. These are the people spammers are targeting. These are the people that need to obfuscate their email address.
So you're saying the same people unable to discern a spam email knows how to embed a mailto: link in an XML document and write webpages. Ok.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I tested and seems accessible on the live demo. Not sure if is as protected as the author claims though, but it might throw some bots for a spin.
Man, I’ve always wondered how to test apps with a (simulated) screen reader, but never got too far
Not sure about desktop apps.
> even when a human visitor has their JavaScript turned off, the email address displayed on the page remains usable NoScript on Firefox with default settings don't render tags (replaces them with placeholders), so this technique doesn't work here. https://imgur.com/2tCAgAf
[flagged]