The Star Destroyer and Imperial Military Doctrine
1–10 of 41 posts
Re: The Star Destroyer and Imperial Military Doctrine
#2Re: The Star Destroyer and Imperial Military Doctrine
#3Re: The Star Destroyer and Imperial Military Doctrine
#4I love that this dude exists and does what he does. I don’t have the attention span to read 20 pages on Star Wars Imperial Military Doctrine, but I appreciate that it exists.
Re: The Star Destroyer and Imperial Military Doctrine
#5This is the sort of silly and smart and insanely-well researched bit of fun that was the norm during the blogging era of ~ 2000-2010 before the social media era really set in. I miss it.
Btw, the total absolute amount of new good blog content is probably not any lower than during the golden age you harken back to. (And of course all the old material is mostly still there, thanks also to various archives.) The relative amount might have gone down, but for your and my individual content consumption absolute amounts matter more.
Re: The Star Destroyer and Imperial Military Doctrine
#6 And this creates a bit of an oddity, because in the Clone Wars, the Republic fleet is essentially built around fast carriers – the Venators – and their fighters, whereas it is the CIS fleet which has specialized gunboats (along with the slower Lucrehulks that function as carriers), but by the time we get to the Empire, the doctrine has switched: the ISD is clearly a gun platform first and foremost, which carries its own fighter screen, but expects to win with its primary battery, not its (flimsy) TIE-Fighters
Not steeped in Star Wars lore, but I thought there was an in-novel explanation that the Emperor was planning on defending against a superior alien threat who had enormous planet-sized ships. For which the Death Star and other heavy guns would make sense.Re: The Star Destroyer and Imperial Military Doctrine
#7This is the sort of silly and smart and insanely-well researched bit of fun that was the norm during the blogging era of ~ 2000-2010 before the social media era really set in. I miss it.
I think we are actually past the social media era (or at least we are past its peak). Btw, the total absolute amount of new good blog content is probably not any lower than during the golden age you harken back to. (And of course all the old material is mostly still there, thanks also to various archives.) The relative amount might have gone down, but for your and my individual content consumption absolute amounts ma…
Re: The Star Destroyer and Imperial Military Doctrine
#8Re: The Star Destroyer and Imperial Military Doctrine
#9Re: The Star Destroyer and Imperial Military Doctrine
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think we are actually past the social media era (or at least we are past its peak). Btw, the total absolute amount of new good blog content is probably not any lower than during the golden age you harken back to. (And of course all the old material is mostly still there, thanks also to various archives.) The relative amount might have gone down, but for your and my individual content consumption absolute amounts ma…
Yes, but how to find it? There are no longer "web rings" and search engines aren't designed to highlight blogs above rich media content.