Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’d love to know the specifics on the ppl hiring the consultants and the work output. In my experience you need someone with experience to chain together any genAI output, as well as validate that it’s even correct. It’s not like it magically does everything for you.
Correct, but that was also the point; all these ‘consultants’ are senior programmers. Nothing is magically done; they use the ai to do the work they were mostly doing before with more people/themselves without ai; now they just focus more on business side. Higher pay and harder to replace (for now). My company does the same but in a niche; our specific tooling is easier to automate (which we did/are still doing) and…
But this is what I want to know. They thought they could replace the ppl in the first place.