Very funny...
Dumb indian script kiddies... sigh
11–20 of 20 posts
Very funny...
Dumb indian script kiddies... sigh
Why is number 1 better than just: [x*2 for x in range(1, 11)]
2 * numpy.arange(1, 11)
The usual notation for working with elements of vector spaces is nice when working with arrays of numbers.sigh ... when will people learn ... one-liners are not good. Especially when they lead to bugs. For example #4 in the list. If you that didn't jump out to you as a bug. You are a fucking idiot and shouldn't be writing production code.
with open("one_liners.py") as f: print f.readlines()
In CPython, a file handle is closed immediately the file goes out of scope, because it's reference-counted. In Jython (and I believe IronPython too), with lazier garbage collection, the filehandle would stay open until it was gc'd. I have no idea about PyPy's behaviour.Yet the most useful oneliner is missing: python -m SimpleHTTPServer
python3 -m http.server"Error establishing a database connection" Very funny... Dumb indian script kiddies... sigh
Why is number 1 better than just: [x*2 for x in range(1, 11)]
I felt the same about number 3. [x in tweet.split() for x in wordlist] Seems better to me than map(lambda x: x in tweet.split(),wordlist) Although the natural thing for me to do would be [x for x in wordlist if x in tweet] Which both generates a list of words instead of booleans(['scala', 'sbt'] instead of [True, False, False, False, False]) and also matches the 'sbt' in tweet.
set(tweet.split()) & set(wordlist)In general, I was expecting more. I was hoping for some slightly more obscure examples, though I guess the point is that many common problems are 1 liners in Python.
I find it weird that the author writes about one-liners in python without knowing about list comprehensions