Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Boston Bar Buzz-Kill

bostonglobe.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 34 posts

Re: Boston Bar Buzz-Kill

#11

Post by jseliger »

rglullis wrote: post #6
jseliger wrote: post #4

but what he ought to be thinking about is bars. No. What he really ought to be thinking about is housing. In Boston—like Silicon Valley—virtually no one can afford housing: http://www.wbur.org/2009/10/26/housing-report (for Boston) and http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2012/05/face... (for Silicon Valley). Part of the way Boston needs to compete is through housing policy, and especially allowing much de…

If we take that Silicon Valley is the undisputed Mecca of technology, then your argument falls through. Like you said, Silicon Valley is also expensive, and yet they still manage to attract more and more people every year. New York, another city who is one of the most expensive in the US, is managing to pass Boston as the tech center of the East Cost. We need to take a look at things where Boston is substantially dif…

yet they still manage to attract more and more people every year

See the second link:

Meanwhile, San Francisco—one of the most expensive cities in the United States—added just 418 new housing units in 2011, the fewest since 1993. What’s more, 149 existing units were removed, leading to a nearly nonexistent increase in housing supply.

Farther south in Menlo Park, Facebook raised billions of dollars in an IPO, instantly putting millions of dollars in the hands of early employees and investors. But as Trulia’s economist Jed Kolko notes, the surge of cash will create losers, by bidding up the cost of local housing. “If Facebook were in Texas or North Carolina,” he observes, “developers would have been building new homes in anticipation of this day,” but in Silicon Valley—as in San Francisco and Marin County farther north—it’s essentially impossible for new construction to meet rising demand for living space. So some of the people living in the area who didn’t just reap a financial windfall are poised to be priced out of their homes as high rents get even higher.

Silicon Valley has largely become zero-sum, population-wise (see also Edward Glaeser's The Triumph of the City on this subject).

Re: Boston Bar Buzz-Kill

#12

Post by mbell »

Anechoic wrote: post #9
aberkowitz wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1. Keep The T open until three or four, so busy entrepreneurs can get home for a few hours of sleep. 2. Get nonlocal VCs and Angels to come to Boston to make deals, and show the locals how it's done. 3. Encourage school to offer indefinite stop out programs. Too many students stash their ideas and suspend their leave of absence lest they lose financial aide or have to reapply to college.

> Keep The T open until three or four, so busy entrepreneurs can get home for a few hours of sleep. Not gonna happen for the rail transit modes, the down time is necessary so maintenance and track inspection can happen (the T isn't like NYC transit where local service can be shunted to express tracks during shutdowns). I suppose the T could substitute buses during those hours, but that will require a lot of money the…

> Not gonna happen for the rail transit modes, the down time is necessary so maintenance and track inspection can happen

Having lived in Boston for 6 years, 4 of them without a car and getting around on the T, if they are doing maintenance on off hours, I've never seen it. Rather they shut down sections of the T line for days at a time and run buses in their place.

Re: Boston Bar Buzz-Kill

#13

Post by rglullis »

jseliger wrote: post #11
rglullis wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If we take that Silicon Valley is the undisputed Mecca of technology, then your argument falls through. Like you said, Silicon Valley is also expensive, and yet they still manage to attract more and more people every year. New York, another city who is one of the most expensive in the US, is managing to pass Boston as the tech center of the East Cost. We need to take a look at things where Boston is substantially dif…

yet they still manage to attract more and more people every year See the second link: Meanwhile, San Francisco—one of the most expensive cities in the United States—added just 418 new housing units in 2011, the fewest since 1993. What’s more, 149 existing units were removed, leading to a nearly nonexistent increase in housing supply. Farther south in Menlo Park, Facebook raised billions of dollars in an IPO, instantl…

And yet, it still is the Mecca of technology, isn't it?

If we are talking about population growth, I'd agree with you. But the point was in changing the demographics, not just growing it.

Re: Boston Bar Buzz-Kill

#14

Post by mbell »

djacobs wrote: post #10
ctide wrote: post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Public transportation is a million times better in San Francisco. Not once have I ever felt like a car was necessary in the ~5 years I've lived here. In the 7 years I spent in Boston, at no point did I have a commute that was less than 3x as long with public transportation compared to just driving. The only time public transportation works in Boston is if you don't have to diverge off the red line.

(Anecdotally,) I disagree: I didn't discover many of the best parts of SF until I started driving around here. It feels like SF geography is really designed to keep you out of certain neighborhoods unless you're driving there to see friends. In Boston, though, even when I had a car, I didn't feel like I was hanging out in better places than when I was riding the T everywhere I went. Again, just an anecdote, but one s…

I think your point is a bit separate from the parent post. I definitely can get anywhere I need to on the T in Boston, it "goes everywhere".

The problem is that the way its laid out does not support movements in a reasonable amount of time unless you happen to be along one of the primary spokes. If your trip involves the outer parts of the green line your completely screwed, it stops every 2 blocks so it takes forever to get anywhere. I used to live in Coolidge Corner and work near Alewife, that is a 15-20 minute drive that took around an hour and half on the T, in T cars packed so tight you were reaching through and around people to hold on to a bar. I despised that trip, if it weren't for the fact that a parking space costs $300+ a month I would never have done it.

Re: Boston Bar Buzz-Kill

#16

Post by mbell »

Here is my problem with Boston:

If you look even remotely like your 25 or younger and not dressed 'like a business person', your presumed to be some random college 'kid' who doesn't know anything. If you live anywhere nice this is often immediately followed by awesome questions like "your parents pay for you to live here?".

To me the Boston business ethos is anti-youth and of an 'old guard' mentality. Your either young, stupid and in college or your in 'business clothes' going to do 'real work' (aka climbing a corporate ladder).

There are definitely some very good groups and things going on for the younger builder crowd but its a long ways from overriding the general stigma that exists in the city. Creating a place where creative young people want to live and have fun would require a number of changes in general city culture to really have an impact.

All that said, I hate how early Boston shuts down, not just the bars but this city as a whole seems to be built around a early to rise, early to sleep mentality.

Re: Boston Bar Buzz-Kill

#17

Post by localhost3000 »

Boston has a great bar scene. Our bars and restaurants are regularly recognized as some of the best in the country. We also have many, many bars for such a small geographic area. IMO the bar scene in Boston is superior to SF.

These are the real pain points for living in Boston as a 20-something:

The T is miserable, always. The weather is miserable, 9 months per year. The attitude is cynical, usually. Massholes are real. Prices are high. We spend too much time comparing ourselves with NYC.

Otherwise, Boston is excellent. The city is clean. People are educated. Some are even attractive. The bike sharing is great.

Bar closing time is not a real issue. It's just a symptom of an old-fashioned, stuck in its ways, puritanical city.

Re: Boston Bar Buzz-Kill

#18

Post by keypusher »

Anechoic wrote: post #9
aberkowitz wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1. Keep The T open until three or four, so busy entrepreneurs can get home for a few hours of sleep. 2. Get nonlocal VCs and Angels to come to Boston to make deals, and show the locals how it's done. 3. Encourage school to offer indefinite stop out programs. Too many students stash their ideas and suspend their leave of absence lest they lose financial aide or have to reapply to college.

> Keep The T open until three or four, so busy entrepreneurs can get home for a few hours of sleep. Not gonna happen for the rail transit modes, the down time is necessary so maintenance and track inspection can happen (the T isn't like NYC transit where local service can be shunted to express tracks during shutdowns). I suppose the T could substitute buses during those hours, but that will require a lot of money the…

I hear this argument a lot, but I live on the Green Line and I very, very rarely see them doing any maintenance after hours on the tracks. Personally, I think it would make a huge difference if they ran 24/7 through Friday and Saturday evenings.

Re: Boston Bar Buzz-Kill

#19

Post by carlob »

mbell wrote: post #14
djacobs wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

(Anecdotally,) I disagree: I didn't discover many of the best parts of SF until I started driving around here. It feels like SF geography is really designed to keep you out of certain neighborhoods unless you're driving there to see friends. In Boston, though, even when I had a car, I didn't feel like I was hanging out in better places than when I was riding the T everywhere I went. Again, just an anecdote, but one s…

I think your point is a bit separate from the parent post. I definitely can get anywhere I need to on the T in Boston, it "goes everywhere". The problem is that the way its laid out does not support movements in a reasonable amount of time unless you happen to be along one of the primary spokes. If your trip involves the outer parts of the green line your completely screwed, it stops every 2 blocks so it takes foreve…

Or 30 minutes by bike, Boston is very bike friendly, if you are not too scared of the weather, that is. But that's something that 300$ of good equipment can fix.

Re: Boston Bar Buzz-Kill

#20

Post by rradu »

localhost3000 wrote: post #17

Boston has a great bar scene. Our bars and restaurants are regularly recognized as some of the best in the country. We also have many, many bars for such a small geographic area. IMO the bar scene in Boston is superior to SF. These are the real pain points for living in Boston as a 20-something: The T is miserable, always. The weather is miserable, 9 months per year. The attitude is cynical, usually. Massholes are re…

Agree with your first two points, especially in the comparison to NYC. They're just not comparable from the outset--NY is way bigger (469 sq miles and 8+ million residents, while Boston is 90 sq miles and 600,000 residents).

But I'd say bar closing time is a real issue. I hate having to end my nights at 2, especially if I have to cab it back anyway because the T isn't running.

Actually, that's what I'd say the biggest issue with Boston is--the T service. Not only does it suck when it is running, it doesn't even run when I need it the most. The MBTA is very poorly-managed and many hundreds of millions of dollars in debt (very few actual improvements to the system are done because of this; it will take the MBTA until ~2050 to pay back all its debts under the current structure assuming it incurs no other expenditures)

Post reply on HN