I'd pay for a no-JS alternative to Jira.
[deleted]
Untitled topic
121–130 of 136 posts
Re: undefined
#122[flagged]
[deleted]
Re: undefined
#123Congrats on the launch! We'd be in business for an alternative and I also thought about building something on my own. What I'm missing would be project-specific workflows (i.e. coding tasks have QA stages at our company) and higher flight levels like initiatives to sync product management, design and engineering. Do you have a roadmap?
[flagged]
Re: undefined
#124Coolest thing on Show HN today :) I love that at it's heart it's just a (very nicely designed) PM tool. Would love to see LLM flows more integrated into product UX like this.
Amazing work!
Edit: Why the hell do people downvote positive comments?? What is wrong with this god awful community - this site desperately needs "Delete Account" I'm done
Re: undefined
#125Is it just me, or does this landing page and product feel half-finished? Missing video, coming soon, no logo...
Looks solid to me for what it is. Especially if compared to jira.com
I see a video on the home page btw
Re: undefined
#126It looks nice. AI for project management is a good use case. As a long time open source contributor and sysadmin, I think it is very important to have a way to self host without docker, with a list of requirements. I recently wanted to try plane, but it requires docker, so I kept using gitea issues for now.
What’s stopping you from following the steps in the Dockerfile if you wanted to run it directly?
You could probably feed the Dockerfile into a LLM and ask it to create a list of instructions for a human to follow.
Re: undefined
#127Great on work creating an alternative to Linear which is a carbon copy of Linear [1]. Linear also been powered by local first sync since 2019, we have AI features shipped and in the pipeline. As YC alumni/design founder of Linear disappointed to see that design/ui/product is treated this way and something to completely rip off from other products. Last 5 years we’ve been iterating on the Linear design and product. We…
Hey Karri, I’m truly sorry for how things have turned out. Our aim was to highlight the importance of design, regardless of the project’s size. We never intended to copy Linear, but rather to consider it as an inspiration for any upcoming tools in this field, emphasizing the need for good design. Rest assured, we will focus our efforts on these aspects and make sure to rectify the situation.
You've got funding, hire a designer, don't copy.
Re: undefined
#128It looks nice. AI for project management is a good use case. As a long time open source contributor and sysadmin, I think it is very important to have a way to self host without docker, with a list of requirements. I recently wanted to try plane, but it requires docker, so I kept using gitea issues for now.
Isn't a dockerfile exactly a list of requirements to run it? Check out the compose for the required services https://github.com/tegonhq/tegon/blob/main/docker-compose.ya... And the server dockerfile for build + run instructions (it's literally just yarn build && yarn start:prod) https://github.com/tegonhq/tegon/blob/main/server/Dockerfile...
It's better, you know it's actually correct/works! (Or higher chance, or you'll see somewhere that it is or is not working, etc.)
Re: undefined
#129I am aghast at what I just saw. This isn't just "inspired by Linear". It quite literally is a carbon copy of it. I'm unsure how you are able to put this out into the world with a straight face.
When adopting tools into a company there are many factors considered beyond just the product itself. One of the big ones is trust. I can't imagine many decision makers seeing what you've done and coming to the conclusion that you're a business they can trust to weld to their own. Internally we treat most of them as partnerships, not transactional.
People tend to assume tools are easily swappable in organizations. They are not. It is a major risky decision that has large cost, privacy, and security concerns. Attorneys are heavily involved in the process (ask me how I know).
Now we could make this risky and costly bet on a well established, trustworthy company, run by industry leaders... or we could go with a company who is now well known for completely ripped off the design of the former and slapped some AI into it. Which would you choose?
If you want to build a successful company that tries to take down Jira (PLEASE DO), you can't start like this.
Re: undefined
#130> Bug Agent, upon bug assignment, will attempt to reproduce the bug, propose solutions, and in some cases, even implement these solutions in a new PR.
How does this work?