I highly recommend the documentary Filmworker to anyone interested in Stanley Kubrick's character. It's about Leon Vitali, the actor who played Lord Bullingdon (the neurotic brother of Lady Lyndon) in Barry Lyndon . After filming Barry Lyndon, he quit acting and became Kubricks personal assistant / factotum for over 20 years. Although some would say he was Kubrick's personal slave. It is utterly shocking to see how b…
A book Stanley Kubrick didn’t want anyone to read is being published
51–60 of 143 posts
Re: A book Stanley Kubrick didn’t want anyone to read is being published
#52Re: A book Stanley Kubrick didn’t want anyone to read is being published
#53So the guy writing the book wanted Lolita to be a lot hornier?
Well, she is a “nymphette” in the book. That novel is so well written and not even in the author’s native language.
There is a famous interview on French TV where Nabokov says as much (in French) [0]
[0] https://www.ina.fr/actualites-ina/mon-archive-preferee/mon-a...
Re: A book Stanley Kubrick didn’t want anyone to read is being published
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
So you believe that what OP wrote is normal boss behaviour? I wouldn't want to work for you.
Normal bosses don’t get Kubrick like results.
Dr. Strangelove
Full Metal Jacket
A Clockwork Orange
A bunch of not bad films:
2001
Lolita
Barry Lyndon
The Shining
Spartacus
One real turd of a film:
Eyes Wide Shut
And a bunch of forgettable filler:
All the other films he made.
Compare this to the Anti-Kubrick, Clint Eastwood, who made:
Unforgiven
Mystic River
Million Dollar Baby
Letters From Iwo Jima
Gran Torino
And a bunch of okay films:
Pretty much everything else
And it’s pretty obvious that you don’t need to be an abusive taskmaster like Kubrick to make great art.
Re: A book Stanley Kubrick didn’t want anyone to read is being published
#55Re: A book Stanley Kubrick didn’t want anyone to read is being published
#56I love Kubrick movies, but my one bit of criticism I'd give (from me - a random guy on the internet, who's never made a movie), is that both 2001 and The Shining both require the viewer to have read the respective books to fully appreciate them. I know it's a cliché to harp on about the ending of 2001, but it really does make a lot more sense after having read the book, which in turn makes the movie a lot more enjoya…
Re: A book Stanley Kubrick didn’t want anyone to read is being published
#57Re: A book Stanley Kubrick didn’t want anyone to read is being published
#58Re: A book Stanley Kubrick didn’t want anyone to read is being published
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe he was happy doing it but it doesn't mean that he was treated well. That era of director dictators caused a lot of suffering.
[flagged]
I mean directors like Kubrick, Hitchcock and John Landis that acted like dictators. See twilight zone accident.
Re: A book Stanley Kubrick didn’t want anyone to read is being published
#60Doesn't seem that controversial. A publisher commissioned a book about the films of Stanley Kubrick, agreeing that Kubrick would be able to veto publishing of the text if he didn't like it. He didn't like it, didn't sign off on it, and the book was never published.
Like if someone hired you to do a Web Site, and there was of course some stipulation that you get to review it. Then you complain the buttons are the wrong color and just reject the whole thing.