NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties to Juul
1–10 of 267 posts
Re: NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties to Juul
#2[deleted]
Re: NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties to Juul
#3“Show me the incentive and I’ll show you the outcome”
Re: NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties to Juul
#4[flagged]
Re: NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties to Juul
#5"4 out of 5 doctors recommend [cigarette brand]"
Re: NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties to Juul
#6Ray Niaura was on the PBS Newshour recently and I was surprised to see a public health researcher seemingly downplay teen use of ecigarettes and nicotine pouches, referring to them as "clean."
Re: NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties to Juul
#7These 2 clowns are psychologists.
Re: NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties to Juul
#8[flagged]
[flagged]
Re: NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties to Juul
#9It really is amazing. We were thiiiiiiis close to having a generation that wasn't addicted to nicotine for the first time in hundreds of years (like, since trade between North America and Europe really became a thing) and these guys pulled this thumb drive that tastes like cotton candy out of nowhere and every young person is just jonesing.
And the regulatory/public opinion environment isn't what it was in the 80s and 90s when we decided to take on cigarettes. Imagine a company being told today that they now have to stop advertising on billboards, can't advertise to kids, and have to pay a fifth of a trillion dollars over 25 years for the harms they caused to Medicaid. Can't, can you?
Re: NYU professors who defended vaping didn't disclose ties to Juul
#10I'm sure there are negative impacts of vaping and it should definitely be more heavily regulated. But the neutering of Juul only to allow dozens of Chinese clones to take their place was such a huge blunder.