131–140 of 150 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
But surely, expulsion is not the answer!
Where in the heck did you all discover this song? It's never been on the radio I assume. I only found it because it cropped up in yahoo messenger/launchcast at some point - never seen it anywhere else.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
> (If Chrome is such a user privacy dumpsterfire, why not implement WebSerial so that people don't have to run Chrome in order to communicate with and program microcontrollers?) This doesn't seem like a logical comparison. Is there no other way to program microcontrollers outside of Chrome?
Well sure, downloadable executables. Which I feel like isn't much better and in a lot of ways worse.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
But surely, expulsion is not the answer!
Where in the heck did you all discover this song? It's never been on the radio I assume. I only found it because it cropped up in yahoo messenger/launchcast at some point - never seen it anywhere else.
Could not load the model because Error: ArtifactIndexedDBCache failed to fetch: https://huggingface.co/mlc-ai/Llama-3-8B-Instruct-q4f16_1-ML...
Also on Mistral 7B again after supposedly full download:
Could not load the model because Error: ArtifactIndexedDBCache failed to fetch: https://huggingface.co/mlc-ai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2-q4f16...
Maybe memory? But if so it would be good to say so.I'm on a 32GB system btw.
After the model is supposedly fully downloaded (about 4GB) I get: Could not load the model because Error: ArtifactIndexedDBCache failed to fetch: https://huggingface.co/mlc-ai/Llama-3-8B-Instruct-q4f16_1-ML... Also on Mistral 7B again after supposedly full download: Could not load the model because Error: ArtifactIndexedDBCache failed to fetch: https://huggingface.co/mlc-ai/Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2-q4f16... Maybe mem…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm never gonna have my non-tech friend do any of this when they can just go to chat.openai.com and call it a day. Most people value convenience at the expense of almost everything else when it comes to technology.
> I'm never gonna have my non-tech friend do any of this Who was making that assertion? I certainly wasn't. In the same way I am never going to tell my non-engineer friends to build their own todo app instead of just using something like Todoist. But if they told me they cared about data privacy/security, I'd walk them through the steps if they cared to hear them.
But you were responding to my comment, and that was the implied part in it (which I later clarified to answer your question).
> In the same way I am never going to tell my non-engineer friends to build their own todo app instead of just using something like Todoist. But if they told me they cared about data privacy/security, I'd walk them through the steps if they cared to hear them.
Fortunately for most apps there's a middle ground between “use a spyware” and “build your own”, and that's exactly why this tool is much needed for LLM in my opinion.
Amazing work, feels like a step forward for LLM usability. Would be interesting if there was a web browser that managed the download/install of models so you could go to a site like this, or any other LLM site/app and it detects whether or not you have models, similar to detecting if you have a webcam or mic for a video call. The user can click "Allow" to allow use of GPU and allow running of models in the background…
Mozilla won't even allow WebSerial to be implemented because it was deemed "too dangerous" - with all sorts of absurd whinging about the devastation that could be unleashed by unsuspecting users allowing a malicious site to access USB serial devices. When someone pointed out that Chrome has had this functionality for years and the world has not imploded...and has enabled many open source projects and web-based microc…
Yes, not everyone is as thrilled about the browser becoming an OS and both of the other players have pretty much declined to implement the standards chrome forced through.
Like yes if you let yourself be tied to proprietary chrome features you will probably be tied to chrome. It’s weird how the HN set embraces the internet explorer/activeX combo of the modern era so openly, to the extent of whining that others don’t implement it/are behind on compatibility - like yes, that’s the point of embrace/extend/extinguish and a quasi-proprietary standard, to provoke exactly your reaction.
I wonder if there is some equivalent to this on the social media of the time, was there some subset of users who really really loved activeX and would only use browsers that supported it? it’s what I need to do my banking, how could I use anything else!?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well sure, downloadable executables. Which I feel like isn't much better and in a lot of ways worse.
Can you elaborate on why you think that? I feel like not everything has to be shoved into the browser, as that is in a lot of ways worse
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is a rumor that OpenAI might've used libgen in their training data.
Someone will. The potential gains are too high to ignore it.
I’m sure the big players like Google, Meta, OpenAI have used anything and everything they can get their hands on.
Libgen is a wonder of the internet. I’m glad it exists.