"Station, Houston: You have a 'go' for capture." I'll never forget these words.
That was great. Arm moving now! Edit: CAPTURE CONFIRMED!
Live: SpaceX Dragon docking with ISS
81–90 of 109 posts
Re: Live: SpaceX Dragon docking with ISS
#82Re: Live: SpaceX Dragon docking with ISS
#83"We've got a dragon by the tail..."
Re: Live: SpaceX Dragon docking with ISS
#84Re: Live: SpaceX Dragon docking with ISS
#85"We've got a dragon by the tail..."
Excellent to see astronauts with a refined sense of humor as well.
Re: Live: SpaceX Dragon docking with ISS
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
That was great. Arm moving now! Edit: CAPTURE CONFIRMED!
Did you hear the part when he said "Looks like we have a dragon by the tail?" I cracked up.
Re: Live: SpaceX Dragon docking with ISS
#87Re: Live: SpaceX Dragon docking with ISS
#88This is just awesome. I'm sitting in the middle of the French country side in a building that was built during Galileo's life time with these links up across three monitors: http://www.n2yo.com/?s=38348 mms://a1709.l1856953708.c18569.g.lm.akamaistream.net/D/1709/18569/v0001/reflector:53708 http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html?param=stati... Watching all of this makes me realise just how lucky we are to be…
Indeed. Sexy times!
Captured dragon: http://imgur.com/Vmnzj and http://imgur.com/mQU91
Re: Live: SpaceX Dragon docking with ISS
#89Question: if Dragon is about 200m lower than ISS, and they are moving at the same velocity at one instant, wouldn't that put them in different orbits? Assuming ISS's orbit was perfectly circular, then Dragon would be moving too slow for its lower orbit, and would sink down, to its perihelion when on the opposite side of the earth, and so on, oscillating up and down, in an elliptical orbit with respect to ISS. The onl…
[deleted]
Re: Live: SpaceX Dragon docking with ISS
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
Aren't lower orbits faster? So wouldn't dragon be moving too slowly to maintain it's orbit, not too fast?
Think of energy. The higher orbit has higher energy with respect to the earth -- gravitational, and by virtue of comparing stable orbits, also kinetic. Dragon will "catch up" with the space station by converting some additional chemical energy (propellant) into kinetic energy, moving into and matching the station's orbit (and gaining the additional gravitational potential). (Or, given the small adjustment needed, per…
For example, geostationary orbit (~36'000km radius) has period of 24h -- i.e., takes whole 24hours to cover all 360 degrees of rotation, having angular speed of 15deg/h, while Hubble's Space Telescope orbit (~560km radius) has period of 96minutes -- i.e., takes just over 1.5h to cover 360 degrees; with angular speed of 240deg/h.
Sure GEO has higher linear velocity and associated kinetic energy, but that's irrelevant.
I guess the Dragon was positioned under the Station so it gains the angular position slowly over time in a natural way.