No evidence helping it? Not a single thing that’s ever happened supports the idea that our current reality was constructed?
> For me, it's easier to take what we see in our own "lawn" and expand it outwards to the cosmos as a whole.
The uncomfortable thing about reality is that it’s often different from what is easier for us.
What you choose to expand out into the galaxy or even the entire universe is a critical choice. You could choose to extend the relationships between plants, or how power structures develop, or the explosion of complexity localized on Earth, or the human tendency to purposefully create environments for life.
> the geological landscapes we see are the result of physics, time and random fluctuations
Most of them. Not all of them. Bingham Canyon Mine is an open pit 4km wide and 1.2km deep. El Teniente mine is 3,000km of tunnels up to 2km deep. There’s Mount Rushmore and the Hoover Dam. There are artificial islands and nuclear test sites.
That’s all just in the last 150 years. Draw the trend of human progress and where does it end up a billion years from now?
That’s even just assuming the conditions that created the universe mirror the conditions here on Earth, which is a tremendous assumption. It might be like having a letter dropped through your door slot for the first time and reasoning the postal service is entirely made of paper folded and stuffed into other paper. The actual reality of mail carriers with pensions, trucks with antilock breaks and sorting machines bigger than any animal that has ever existed would be unfathomable. Anyone suggesting it would be easily dismissed in favor of a simpler and less correct explanation.