This seems so backwards to me. As a user of LLMs, it's clear to me that tokens generated by ChatGPT and similar are not to be interpreted as a legally-valid statement by the company making the LLMs, unless explicitly stated by said company. I certainly don't engage with them that way. I believe this to be fairly obvious to anyone who has used such tools, so I just see this as an opportunity to sue for a quick buck.
NOYB doesn't make money out of suing. I otherwise agree with the rest of your comment.
ChatGPT provides false information about people, and OpenAI can't correct it
11–20 of 92 posts
Re: ChatGPT provides false information about people, and OpenAI can't correct it
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
NOYB doesn't make money out of suing. I otherwise agree with the rest of your comment.
I just looked into what noyb is, thank you for pointing this out. Perhaps this is something that had to be brought to court at one point or another, so we can set a precedent one way or the other, then. At the moment I think I'm hoping nothing comes out of this.
Re: ChatGPT provides false information about people, and OpenAI can't correct it
#13People have a fundamental misunderstanding of what LLMs are. I’ve had to explain this so many times even to engineers. People keep using it as Google. It is not a mechanism to retrieve facts. It’s rather a reasoning mechanism, that when used like a search engine generates text that looks like output from a retrieval of facts. The article talks about OpenAI being unwilling to correct errors. But they just can’t. There…
It's labeled "AI", aka "artificial intelligence".
So clearly, it's intelligent enough to tell fact from fiction, right? It's intelligent enough to read and repeat facts, right? It's artificial intelligence, isn't it?
I'm playing Devil's Advocate here, obviously. I'm aware how this actually works like you, but the way it's billed you can't expect the commons to understand any of this in any other way. There is a very specific concept of what AI is among the masses, regardless if "AI" is it or not.
If you call something a duck, you can't blame someone for saying it's a duck.
Re: ChatGPT provides false information about people, and OpenAI can't correct it
#14Re: ChatGPT provides false information about people, and OpenAI can't correct it
#15IMHO this is not a fixable problem, it's not even a new problem because false information existed since ever. With the Web it become globally available, with social media it become globally spreadable and with "AI" it has become of endless supply in form and variety. Humans need to develop humane defense mechanisms for the new reality, tech cannot be stopped and cannot be hermetically insulated against mistakes or ba…
Re: ChatGPT provides false information about people, and OpenAI can't correct it
#16People have a fundamental misunderstanding of what LLMs are. I’ve had to explain this so many times even to engineers. People keep using it as Google. It is not a mechanism to retrieve facts. It’s rather a reasoning mechanism, that when used like a search engine generates text that looks like output from a retrieval of facts. The article talks about OpenAI being unwilling to correct errors. But they just can’t. There…
The best that can be done is just what Gemini does: a button to (smartly) compare the generated text against google search results.
Re: ChatGPT provides false information about people, and OpenAI can't correct it
#17People have a fundamental misunderstanding of what LLMs are. I’ve had to explain this so many times even to engineers. People keep using it as Google. It is not a mechanism to retrieve facts. It’s rather a reasoning mechanism, that when used like a search engine generates text that looks like output from a retrieval of facts. The article talks about OpenAI being unwilling to correct errors. But they just can’t. There…
>> It is not a mechanism to retrieve facts
Then bing AI powered by chatgpt shows on its site
>> [Hello, this is Bing! I’m the new AI-powered chat mode of Microsoft Bing that] can help you quickly get information.
if get is a synonym of retrieve and facts is a synonym of information, I'd argue that maybe it's not people misunderstanding what LLMs are but maybe someone explaining it wrong?
Guess in the world of marketing words don't carry any value anymore, then I agree with you
Re: ChatGPT provides false information about people, and OpenAI can't correct it
#18That's because it's being used in the wrong way. It isn't a factual database.
It's a crappy usecase. And much better ones are typically being overlooked outside a few smart enterprise integrations.
To put it mildly - if someone wants to use LLMs to build a factual chatbot, they should probably just start mining crypto instead, as they'll waste less money on jumping on a trend. But if they think a bit about how LLMs can be used in nearly any other situation, they'll be miles ahead of the majority chasing this gold rush.
Re: ChatGPT provides false information about people, and OpenAI can't correct it
#19Popcorn time: NOYB (Max Schrems) filed a complaint against OpenAI with the Austrian DPA: ChatGPT is not GDPR compliant.
Sounds like a win for the US...get competing economies to block the technology for trivial reasons, then by time the bugs are worked out they will be so far behind that their only choice will be to choose US-based solutions