11–20 of 210 posts
I just looked at the Killed By Google gallery and it's got 295 rows of 3 dead projects per row (except for the first and last rows of 2). That's 883 kills. That is truly impressive! I look forward to welcoming "Quantum AI" to that graveyard.
I just looked at the Killed By Google gallery and it's got 295 rows of 3 dead projects per row (except for the first and last rows of 2). That's 883 kills. That is truly impressive! I look forward to welcoming "Quantum AI" to that graveyard.
Quantum machine learning is postulated to overcoming the issue with LLMs of exhibiting incredible intuition but limited intelligence.
I have heard this mentioned several times in the last decade or so : "The only thing a quantum computer definitively does better than a classical computer is simulating a quantum computer."
Whether this capability is useful is up in the air.
Note that in practice, classical computers are going to be better at factoring numbers for the foreseeable future.
LLMs have started to show what they will never be able to do, as discussed here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40179232 Quantum machine learning is postulated to overcoming the issue with LLMs of exhibiting incredible intuition but limited intelligence.
The fact this prize exists is admitting that no one has figured out a use for quantum computers. I have heard this mentioned several times in the last decade or so : "The only thing a quantum computer definitively does better than a classical computer is simulating a quantum computer." Whether this capability is useful is up in the air. Note that in practice, classical computers are going to be better at factoring nu…
LLMs have started to show what they will never be able to do, as discussed here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40179232 Quantum machine learning is postulated to overcoming the issue with LLMs of exhibiting incredible intuition but limited intelligence.
Why does Quantum===intuition?