Live data from Hacker News

Brutalist Churches

dezeen.com

31–40 of 81 posts

Re: Brutalist Churches

#31
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why are you finding brutalist architecture oppressive?

They tend to look like something someone who didn’t give a shit made. “I just need a box for people to be in, who cares what it looks like?” The example brutalist churches in another post here look like someone doing a horrible experiment in the Sims made buildings without bothering to use anything but some default wall texture they found buried in the dev tools that doesn’t even tile very well, because they just nee…

I don't see it that way at all. A lot of care and thought went into these designs, and they evoke the kind of awe you would expect from a god's house. These aren't just hulking concrete bunkers like some of the institutional brutalism you see.

Re: Brutalist Churches

#32
post #27

I want to read this article but the website has other ideas. Horrible UX and horrible ads (redundant, I know).

For what it's worth Andrex, gusto sucks ass. Their customer service sucks and is a sham.

Re: Brutalist Churches

#33
The first church in the article (second after the banner picture), "Santa Maria Immacolata"[0] has an important historical meaning.

It is located in the village of Longarone, which was completely wiped out in 1963 due to the disaster of the Vajont dam[1]. Tl;dr the dam should not have been built there because of the geology of the area, but they did anyway; an enormous piece of the mountain fell into the lake, causing a huge wave. Nearly 2000 people died.

The church was built as part of the rebuilding of the whole village.

[0] (Italian) https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiesa_di_Santa_Maria_Immacola...

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vajont_Dam

Re: Brutalist Churches

#34
post #7

Shouldn't churches evoke feelings of divinity instead of oppression? (I know it's popular to hate on brutalist architecture, but really isn't a place of worship the last place you'd want it?)

Many of the brutalist churches I’ve seen do not, IMO, “evoke feelings of oppression” (aside from any one might have as a result of personal conflict with the religious institution behind them, which is a separate issue.) Including, I should mention, most of those in TFA.

I suppose we just have to chalk it up to different tastes in art. To me, my first thought on seeing most of those pictures is how they look like settings for some implausibly dystopian sci-fi movie.

Re: Brutalist Churches

#36
post #7

Shouldn't churches evoke feelings of divinity instead of oppression? (I know it's popular to hate on brutalist architecture, but really isn't a place of worship the last place you'd want it?)

our perhaps evoking the feeling of being a part of something bigger than yourself? which brutalist architecture absolutely does.

Re: Brutalist Churches

#37
If you're ever in Reykjavík, check out the Hallgrímskirkja. Completed in 1986, located visibly, on a hill. From outside it's very impressive, with the soaring spire shaped (IMHO) like a supersonic aircraft ascending vertically. A stone angel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hallgr%C3%ADmskirkja

https://www.re.is/is/blog/guide-to-hallgrimskirkja-church-re...

https://yourfriendinreykjavik.com/hallgrimskirkja-a-tribute-...

Re: Brutalist Churches

#38
post #10
post #7

Shouldn't churches evoke feelings of divinity instead of oppression? (I know it's popular to hate on brutalist architecture, but really isn't a place of worship the last place you'd want it?)

Why are you finding brutalist architecture oppressive?

It's not natural, grey is a stupid colour, no ornaments. Only architects like brutalism.

But I am happy to know that brutalist churches in Germany will be destruct at first than older churches.

Re: Brutalist Churches

#39
post #38
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why are you finding brutalist architecture oppressive?

It's not natural, grey is a stupid colour, no ornaments. Only architects like brutalism. But I am happy to know that brutalist churches in Germany will be destruct at first than older churches.

> It's not natural

A point of brutalism is "form follows function and "showcase the bare building materials" (1) - in other words, that's how the material looks, naturally. Bare, unpainted concrete is in fact more natural and honest than painted concrete. And brutalism deliberately leans into that naturalism (of modern materials).

1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brutalist_architecture

Post reply on HN