Earlier quoted context omitted.
And how is it money laundering if it turned out the money wasn't proceeds of crime.
I spent a few minutes trying to figure that out, but Reason is incredibly slanted, they just link to some even nuttier site, and even starting with news I couldn't find specifics of the one count he was convicted on. But I'd be a little skeptical of Reason's handwave "properly reported to the government". Reported on taxes? To SEC? As part of disclosure for this trial? One way it could be money laundering without bei…
They certainly approach stories with an editorial perspective, but they're generally factually reliable and hardly "incredibly slanted".