Show HN: LinkedIn meets OnlyFans

#1

Post by taeyangyou » Wed, Apr 24, 2024, 5:01 PM UTC

Show HN: LinkedIn meets OnlyFans
ketchupnow.com

Re: Show HN: LinkedIn meets OnlyFans

#2

Post by martinky24 » Wed, Apr 24, 2024, 5:11 PM UTC

I don't think OP understands what "OnlyFans" implies. It's a sex work site. Which is awesome! Let people do what they want! But... there's not a lot of content on there that isn't sex work oriented. And that's how references to the site are culturally understood.

Re: Show HN: LinkedIn meets OnlyFans

#3

Post by pelagicAustral » Wed, Apr 24, 2024, 5:20 PM UTC

martinky24 wrote: post #2

I don't think OP understands what "OnlyFans" implies. It's a sex work site. Which is awesome! Let people do what they want! But... there's not a lot of content on there that isn't sex work oriented. And that's how references to the site are culturally understood.

I haven't spend a whole lot of time dwelling in the annals of the OnlyFans history, and so I do wonder, was the current status quo of that implementation what the creator meant it to be, or it just happened to turn itself organically into its current form?

Re: Show HN: LinkedIn meets OnlyFans

#4

Post by martinky24 » Wed, Apr 24, 2024, 5:25 PM UTC

pelagicAustral wrote: post #3

martinky24 wrote: post #2

I don't think OP understands what "OnlyFans" implies. It's a sex work site. Which is awesome! Let people do what they want! But... there's not a lot of content on there that isn't sex work oriented. And that's how references to the site are culturally understood.

I haven't spend a whole lot of time dwelling in the annals of the OnlyFans history, and so I do wonder, was the current status quo of that implementation what the creator meant it to be, or it just happened to turn itself organically into its current form?

Considering the primary founders all come from online pornography backgrounds... It's not an accident.

Re: Show HN: LinkedIn meets OnlyFans

#5

Post by taeyangyou » Wed, Apr 24, 2024, 7:31 PM UTC

martinky24 wrote: post #4

pelagicAustral wrote: post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I haven't spend a whole lot of time dwelling in the annals of the OnlyFans history, and so I do wonder, was the current status quo of that implementation what the creator meant it to be, or it just happened to turn itself organically into its current form?

Considering the primary founders all come from online pornography backgrounds... It's not an accident.

Just meant to highlight the monetization aspect and be a bit radical! Alright maybe LinkedIn meets Fiverr