Live data from Hacker News

Google fires more workers after CEO says workplace isn’t for politics

washingtonpost.com

31–40 of 290 posts

Re: Google fires more workers after CEO says workplace isn’t for politics

#31

Good. You're there to work. It also feels uniquely selfish. "I love the money but I still want to protest!" If you feel so strongly then quit but that would require sacrifice.

Absolutely. Have the courage of your convictions to refuse to work for a company you find immoral.

I assume these people would have refused to work for an arms manufacturer or an oil company, but maybe they could try to change one of those from the inside.

Re: Google fires more workers after CEO says workplace isn’t for politics

#32
Indeed as they should be ... it is a job to make money not be a political karen.

Politics is always a sh!tshow to be avoided personally and definitely at your place of work.

A few years ago Google bended to a small few looks like no more will they!

Re: Google fires more workers after CEO says workplace isn’t for politics

#34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personally if my customer was using my services to figure out the optimal time to kill someone in a way that also kills their family, and my employees were collectively protesting that, I would just decline their money.

Fortunately this is not the case here.

It's quite literally the case here.

Except I left out the part where they also ask chatGPT who should they kill and it gives them recommendations based on browsing history and what group chats they're in.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/dec/01/the-gospel-how...

Re: Google fires more workers after CEO says workplace isn’t for politics

#35

James Damore was fired from Google[0] when he went out of his way to ensure his politics were to be kept private. What on earth did these people think would happen if they didn't attempt to keep their politics private? [0] https://www.theverge.com/2017/8/7/16111052/google-james-damo...

They either knew they were going to get fired or thought since they are in the majority position at Google they wouldn't have a punishment.

Re: Google fires more workers after CEO says workplace isn’t for politics

#36

Well I'm pretty sure the people protesting were aware this could be the outcome. So in that regard, I think it's very admirable for them to put their convictions over money. From the outside, I agree with their opinion. But then again, money screams and people talk. I feel like a lot of people in tech tend to be very much "not interested" when it comes to politics, even though tech and particularly these big companie…

What does genocide mean in this context? Are you saying that an enemy can just put women and children in front of every military installation and the other side can never respond to any attacks anymore?

Re: Google fires more workers after CEO says workplace isn’t for politics

#37
post #13
post #5

Sure, if all it takes is raising a rainbow flag on top of the building and some words of the CEO they are all for it. But as soon as Google's bottom line is involved they behave pretty predictable.

[flagged]

Israel army killed more than 20 thousands children and women.

Re: Google fires more workers after CEO says workplace isn’t for politics

#38

> Google says that each worker it fired actively disrupted its offices, while the workers dispute the claims, saying some of those fired did not even enter the company’s office on the day of coordinated demonstrations against the company. Isn't this a pretty critical point that the Washington Post should have looked into a bit more?

They probably got the list of people to fire from some list of people who replied on some internal message board.

Far easier to prove involvement when there is a written record, rather than evidence of you entering a building (you might have other reasons to be there).

Re: Google fires more workers after CEO says workplace isn’t for politics

#39
post #3

Rule #2: If the customer is...

Personally if my customer was using my services to figure out the optimal time to kill someone in a way that also kills their family, and my employees were collectively protesting that, I would just decline their money.

Not if the customer is killing a potential future adversary to my family or even distant relatives.

Morality is a social construct. The selfish gene is a biological construct.

Re: Google fires more workers after CEO says workplace isn’t for politics

#40

Good. You're there to work. It also feels uniquely selfish. "I love the money but I still want to protest!" If you feel so strongly then quit but that would require sacrifice.

If your goal is to change the companies behavior, then protesting and getting fired and getting a WaPo story is more effective than resigning in protest.

Because all anyone not on your immediate team would know is the HR sanitized "they left for other opportunities, we're so happy for the contribution they..."

I think it's silly that people will protest like this with the expectation that they won't immediately get fired but that's the play if you want to make noise.

Post reply on HN