[flagged]
Dify, a visual workflow to build/test LLM applications
101–110 of 129 posts
Re: Dify, a visual workflow to build/test LLM applications
#102[flagged]
Re: Dify, a visual workflow to build/test LLM applications
#103[flagged]
Re: Dify, a visual workflow to build/test LLM applications
#104wtf is up with all these bots ? it's ironic they decided to do this on a post about LLMs. Are they feeling threatened that LLMs are taking their jobs ?
I’m seeing them in a bunch of other threads. This is the first time I have seen HN being spammed like this.
Re: Dify, a visual workflow to build/test LLM applications
#105> https://github.com/langgenius/dify/blob/main/LICENSE everyone is apparently a license pioneer
[deleted]
Re: Dify, a visual workflow to build/test LLM applications
#106[flagged]
[deleted]
Re: Dify, a visual workflow to build/test LLM applications
#107Re: Dify, a visual workflow to build/test LLM applications
#108"AI means the end of coding" didn't age well. It turns out to get the most out of LLMs you need to program them.
LLMs mean now you can write simple imperative code to perform NLP tasks.
Re: Dify, a visual workflow to build/test LLM applications
#109Wow I've never seen so many fake accounts on a HN post before. So then is it fair to say the Github stars for this project could also perhaps be artificially inflated? This month they started to go exponential: https://github.com/langgenius/dify?tab=readme-ov-file#star-h...
> Github stars for this project could also perhaps be artificially inflated?
Maybe, but I don't think so. The number of people engaging with the project is what I would expect from the number of stars received.
https://devboard.gitsense.com/langgenius?r=langgenius%2Fdify...
I've seen projects with 5,000+ stars in a month and only have 20-30 people interacting with the project.
Full disclosure: This is my tool
Re: Dify, a visual workflow to build/test LLM applications
#110How does it compare with MagickML?