An Exploration of SBCL Internals (2020)

Post by SEXMCNIGGA6510 » Mon, Apr 22, 2024, 11:17 PM UTC

Post by indianmilf28586 » Mon, Apr 22, 2024, 11:30 PM UTC

Post by sexmc32071 » Mon, Apr 22, 2024, 11:36 PM UTC

Post by sexmc13032 » Mon, Apr 22, 2024, 11:38 PM UTC

Post by User23 » Mon, Apr 22, 2024, 11:54 PM UTC

pfdietz wrote: post #8

hedora wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Java took over by targeting large teams of inexperienced developers. C++ took over by adding OO to C with zero cost abstractions, and then evolving into modern C++ (which discourages OO and encourages composition via template instantiation) without leaving programs behind. Lisp has supported composition forever (it is one of the big advantages of functional programming), and the macro language is similar to templates…

> is often interpreted Every competitive Common Lisp implementation has compilation. SBCL defaults to not even using an interpreter for eval.