Live data from Hacker News

No one buys books

elysian.press

51–60 of 752 posts

Re: No one buys books

#51
I recently started buying paper books.

Yes, it's not particularly ecological, but I found that I'm able to focus at the text much better this way. My Kindle (despite plenty of obvious advantages) just doesn't really work for me.

It took me years to realize this, but I always start to tinker with the brightness settings, switch pages back and forth, go into the book library and back, play with highlighting words, etc. I will do anything instead of reading the text. Meanwhile with a paper book I don't have an urge to flip a page back and forth and observe how it behaves. I can focus on the text.

Not sure why I am this way.

Re: No one buys books

#53
post #44

Does this include technical books? O'Reilly and Manning seem to have substantial customers. Or is the licensing of PDFs excluded from such figures?

Technical books are part of it, and O’Reilly can probably do much more accurate forecasting on their titles than others do, but they still have total reach problems.

If I think of all the technical things I’ve done, there are some I’ve bought lots of books for, and others I’ve never bought a book at all, including some relatively major languages.

Re: No one buys books

#54
I've published a few self-published books on Amazon about my global adventures. While sales are not making me rich, they certainly do sell month after month.

Re: No one buys books

#55
Anecdotally I'm buying and reading more books now than at any other point in my life.

Reading gets me away from a computer screen, which I would otherwise stare at from sunrise to sundown.

I tend to be a late adopter. Once things are close to obsolete I usually get involved!

Although books have the disadvantage of being a similar focal distance as a screen and for this reason is still bad for my eyesight!

Re: No one buys books

#57
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm the same way, and also: I want to not have to pay a subscription fee forever. Once I have what I want, then that's it! I'm don't need to spend another dime. But if I use Spotify or whatever, I have to keep paying forever. It is a much worse deal.

The difference between music and books is time investment. New music comes out all the time, and I'm always discovering old music. A subscription works great for music because I can listen to so many songs. Books not so much, and I consider myself a reader.

And even with books it becomes much easier to say “I’ll reread the lord of the rings on this flight” than it is to take a wild risk on an unknown book and author.

Re: No one buys books

#58
I've asked a number of agents online for two numbers:

1) How many unsolicited queries have you received, in whatever time period you like: month, quarter, year, forever?

2) How many turned into published books?

None will provide that data, but I strongly suspect that the answer to #2 is "zero."

They'll happily quote you BS quantities, like "a bunch" or "a handful."

So as this article says, they spend their time chasing celebrities, online influencers, and friends of friends. And not making a whole lot of money anyway.

Re: No one buys books

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I suspect in the past they also read far more nonfiction.

I wouldn’t bet on it, unless we’re counting user-generated posts online, and clickbait “articles”. Which, maybe we should. [edit] JFC I misread your sense of “read”, I think we agree.

Updated my post. I don't think I encountered that "bug" in the English language before.
Post reply on HN