101–110 of 160 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're obviously not posting in good faith, but their docs are CC-BY-SA, and I comply with the terms. Bro.
No link to license: non-compliant. Less theft, less lying about compliance, more compliance please.
From that page: > Will my code be used for training AI models? > GitLab does not train generative AI models based on private (non-public) data. The vendors we work with also do not train models based on private data. So they will steal your code if it is public, ignoring license. Understood.
If a person can read it and learn from it, AI should be able to do the same.
Gitlab really should stop adding features: the thing is bloated with tons of menus and options that most users don't use or understand. PMs seem to need to do PM, stop them, listen to tech people.
From that page: > Will my code be used for training AI models? > GitLab does not train generative AI models based on private (non-public) data. The vendors we work with also do not train models based on private data. So they will steal your code if it is public, ignoring license. Understood.
If a person can read it and learn from it, AI should be able to do the same.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They argue their use is transformative and thus the works are not derivatives.
Do you mind explaining further ?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If a person can read it and learn from it, AI should be able to do the same.
If it's patented they can't use it... If it's a copy left license I would say that at that point anything made by the ai should be copy left as well. Just because you think a machine should have the right to use open source code doesn't mean the author or the license agree.
You can also read and learn from copyleft and use that learning elsewhere.
Remember, copyright does not apply to ideas. It applies to a specific individual instantiation. In theory.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If a person can read it and learn from it, AI should be able to do the same.
There's a valid moral question here, in short: why? I care about helping other people. Helping some type of amoral entity that's usually controlled by another amoral for-profit entity: why would I help those?
Honestly I agree that in the current state of things, it's fair for them to train on public data as long as the license doesn't forbid it. I learned to code this way, so it makes sense to allow AIs to do the same, for now. If it's a problem, just use another license.
Back to self hosting my code. Side note: Gitlab is one of the few companies to provide a self hosted version of their VCS. https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/install/requirements.html Also gitea is a much more lightweight option and can use sqlite for db. Much easier to deploy on a rpi