Live data from Hacker News

Mark Zuckerberg married

facebook.com

221–224 of 224 posts

Re: Mark Zuckerberg married

#221

The last week for Zuckerberg: Monday: Girlfriend got M.D. Tuesday: 28th birthday. Friday: IPO. Saturday: Married. http://twitter.com/#!/gizmosachin/status/204032145591767040 Amazing!

I'd guess that the first two are coincidence, and the latter two chosen. Interesting to try and see a person just through the purity of fact of choice rather than media narrative.

Was the IPO Hackathon his stag do?

Re: Mark Zuckerberg married

#222

As erdemozkan stated in a duplicate discussion: Mark married Priscilla one day after the IPO. That means they were waiting for IPO to get married. Sorry for asking a question that may seem obvious to others, but why were they waiting for the IPO? Is it for financial or legal reasons, such as a Community Property State? Did Zuckerberg sign a prenuptial agreement? An internet search implies he didn't. This reminds me o…

> Did Zuckerberg sign a prenuptial agreement? An internet search implies he didn't. Yes. That's exactly the kind of questions that Google helps you solve.

[deleted]

Re: Mark Zuckerberg married

#223
post #166

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Given how carefully he has protected his stake thus far, it would be very surprising if he had not done a pre-nup.

He doesn't really need one. Facebook is a premarital asset and he has no other assets. In California anything you own before marriage is yours including the gains on those assets and you can take money out and spent it on other things and as long as you can trace it back to the premarital money then your good to go.

Pre-nups address many other things as well including alimony and future earnings.

Re: Mark Zuckerberg married

#224

For the HN crowd that likes random behind-the-scenes details: In the photo, the sun is low and behind them. This makes great rim light--and looks fantastic through the veil--but it also means you need to use strobes or a reflector to light their faces. It's probably a reflector, gold side up, something like this: http://www.flickr.com/photos/justin_fotog/6018934549/ They're super glare-y to look at; it's kind of hard…

It's really common to see people squinting / looking horrible with reflectors. I would guess a flash because Priscila looks quite relaxed, and most wedding photographers work without assistants.

Yeah, I wasn't sure here! You can usually tell based on the highlights in the eyes, but the photos I found weren't high-res enough to tell.

Apparently it was a surprise wedding, and they didn't even tell the photographer until last minute: http://fstoppers.com/zuckerbergs-photographer-also-caught-of...

Post reply on HN