61–70 of 160 posts
Back to self hosting my code. Side note: Gitlab is one of the few companies to provide a self hosted version of their VCS. https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/install/requirements.html Also gitea is a much more lightweight option and can use sqlite for db. Much easier to deploy on a rpi
From that page: > Will my code be used for training AI models? > GitLab does not train generative AI models based on private (non-public) data. The vendors we work with also do not train models based on private data. So they will steal your code if it is public, ignoring license. Understood.
If a person can read it and learn from it, AI should be able to do the same.
Instead I get AI companions writing comments like "This code is unintelligible and batshit complicated, kill it with fire" when I was hoping for a doc string
From that page: > Will my code be used for training AI models? > GitLab does not train generative AI models based on private (non-public) data. The vendors we work with also do not train models based on private data. So they will steal your code if it is public, ignoring license. Understood.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
If a person can read it and learn from it, AI should be able to do the same.
There's a valid moral question here, in short: why? I care about helping other people. Helping some type of amoral entity that's usually controlled by another amoral for-profit entity: why would I help those?
Llama, mistral and co.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’ve been feeling more and more that we should reconsider open source licenses to protect our rights as authors from LLM vendors. I’m not against them basing their models on my work. I do have reservations on them generating their models on my work and creating derivative works without respecting the license. It’s why I’ve started to use the MIT license less and less and have adopted various from the GPL family. Mode…
https://github.com/non-ai-licenses/non-ai-licenses These aren’t official (& hosted on a different, proprietary data siphoner), but there are attempts to add anti-AI clauses.
And the CC0 license seems extremely contradictory with this added clause. I would definitely stay away from all of these licenses.
From that page: > Will my code be used for training AI models? > GitLab does not train generative AI models based on private (non-public) data. The vendors we work with also do not train models based on private data. So they will steal your code if it is public, ignoring license. Understood.
If a person can read it and learn from it, AI should be able to do the same.
If it's a copy left license I would say that at that point anything made by the ai should be copy left as well.
Just because you think a machine should have the right to use open source code doesn't mean the author or the license agree.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's a valid moral question here, in short: why? I care about helping other people. Helping some type of amoral entity that's usually controlled by another amoral for-profit entity: why would I help those?
Because you get to use it too? Llama, mistral and co.
Normally the "can't run on your hardware" is a little dubious, but given how insanely high the hardware requirements can get to run these I think it's meaningful here.
Back to self hosting my code. Side note: Gitlab is one of the few companies to provide a self hosted version of their VCS. https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/install/requirements.html Also gitea is a much more lightweight option and can use sqlite for db. Much easier to deploy on a rpi
Are you concerned at all about the raspi’s sd card corrupting/failing? I’d feel like this would always be at the back of my mind