Live data from Hacker News

Our biggest ever river catch?

theoceancleanup.com

91–100 of 190 posts

Re: Our biggest ever river catch?

#92
post #56

Why can’t we just start charging producers of waste a direct cost. If we charged producers (McDonald’s, coke, Pepsi, supermarket, uniliver etc) $1 for every plastic bottle they used, we’d have a budget for clean up and a change in motivations. Suddenly glass reuse programs are suddenly cost comparable etc

Because plastic from McDonald's is not that big a problem. Fishing gear https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/nov/07/invisibl... and carbon fibers are much bigger https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230703133034.h... plastic polluters.

Re: Our biggest ever river catch?

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Basically yes. Petroleum burned produces CO2. Petroleum plasticized does not. The more market share that plastic packaging eats up, the lower emissions are.

I’d call that being more neutral than a sink unless I’m misunderstanding you. I consider paper a sink, because trees are actively sequestering atmospheric CO2.

Standing trees will aways be more of a carbon sink than dead flat trees.

Re: Our biggest ever river catch?

#94
post #82

A commendable operation but sadly, this is a very small fraction of a percentage of the 8-10 million tons of plastic entering the ocean each year. The Ocean Cleanup themselves have estimated at least 75% of ocean trash is from fishing boats, and from living on a remote tropical island myself, at least 90% of the things you find washed up on the beach appear to be from Chinese fishing vessels. (there's usually Chinese…

I’m glad I’m doing my part one straw at a time /s

Re: Our biggest ever river catch?

#95
post #87

I LOVE this company. We need more of them. Innovative, Solving world problems. Aware of their impact. I am always encouraging people to donate. These are the kinds of projects that might save us. I wish YC, and it's kin, would fund companies like this.

Wouldn’t make sense for YC - where’s their return?

It would require both treaties and some way this company can be the preferred supplier (maybe a 10 year contract to operate).

Re: Our biggest ever river catch?

#96
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you mean it is a carbon sink? Extracting oil from underground then turning it into plastic above ground? Or do you mean something different?

Basically yes. Petroleum burned produces CO2. Petroleum plasticized does not. The more market share that plastic packaging eats up, the lower emissions are.

An Iran Israel war would have the same effect.

Re: Our biggest ever river catch?

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’d call that being more neutral than a sink unless I’m misunderstanding you. I consider paper a sink, because trees are actively sequestering atmospheric CO2.

Standing trees will aways be more of a carbon sink than dead flat trees.

A tree captures CO2 so, of course, but tangental.
Post reply on HN