Earlier quoted context omitted.
Graphite is a pretty common word, and it's easy to make the connection between that and what graphene is. Same goes for gold and goldene. Not so much for chrysos and chrysene.
The point of systematic naming is predictability through consistency, not appealing to the lowest common denominator. But Sweden isn’t exactly known for its stellar educational system, so it doesn’t surprise me that their chemists don’t learn Greek.
Goldene: A single atom layer of gold
111–120 of 128 posts
Re: Goldene: A single atom layer of gold
#112If it weren’t for the captions, I would assume that every single photo in this article was stock photography: “Scientists doing sciencey things.”
I didn’t get that impression since the characters are recurring.
Re: Goldene: A single atom layer of gold
#113It would be interesting to research (Google) how many of them we can reliably make.
Re: Goldene: A single atom layer of gold
#114Earlier quoted context omitted.
Measuring success by whether the proponents delivers on their promises seems entirely fair.
By that criteria, everything is a failure. After all, it's the job of the proponent to oversell you on things.
Has nobody ever told you "come on, it'll be fun" and proven to be right by subsequent events?
Re: Goldene: A single atom layer of gold
#115Earlier quoted context omitted.
There isn't an exact moment, any more than there is an exact height that is "tall". And yet, tall people exist.
The tallest person in the world will say that only normal and short people exist.
Re: Goldene: A single atom layer of gold
#116This phenomenon is called intercalation and what the researchers had discovered was titanium gold carbide."
Hmm, never knew about Intercalation before this... let's learn more about it!:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intercalation_(chemistry)
>"By 2023, all commercial Li-ion cells use intercalation compounds as active materials"
OK, so Intercalation appears to be deeply related to the principle of energy storage (of which one specific subcase is Li-ion batteries...)
Also, there's this:
>"“If you make a material extremely thin, something extraordinary happens – as with graphene. The same thing happens with gold. As you know, gold is usually a metal, but if single-atom-layer thick, the gold can become a semiconductor instead,” says Shun Kashiwaya, researcher at the Materials Design Division at Linköping University."
If this is the case -- then the following would be an interesting question for all students of Chemistry, present and future:
Can all Periodic Table Elements -- be turned into semiconductors (specifically transistors) -- if they are only a single atom layer thick?
?
And, a follow-up set of questions (once that's known):
If any Elements cannot -- then which ones, exactly, cannot, and why exactly, can they not be?
?
???
(You know -- for all of the Chem majors out there! )
Re: Goldene: A single atom layer of gold
#117Earlier quoted context omitted.
> There's a similar wrong meme about how you never really "touch" anything. Ok, what is the exact moment you touch something? How close do the atoms need to be?
How about this: two objects are touching when the interaction forces between the objects are of similar magnitude to the interatomic forces within the objects. Very generally speaking, this will happen when the distance between the objects is about the same as the distance between atoms within the objects.
Re: Goldene: A single atom layer of gold
#118Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn’t get that impression since the characters are recurring.
Repeating characters doesn't mean "not stock". Consider https://www.shutterstock.com/g/antonioguillem - you've seen some of his work. https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/disloyal-man-walkin... ... and an entire story of stock photos https://www.ladbible.com/community/weird-extra-pictures-show...
Re: Goldene: A single atom layer of gold
#119If it weren’t for the captions, I would assume that every single photo in this article was stock photography: “Scientists doing sciencey things.”
Maybe the photographer told the scientists - your apparatus doesn't look right - here use this pipette and beaker for the photo.
Re: Goldene: A single atom layer of gold
#120Earlier quoted context omitted.
Disagree. The comment is on price. Price is driven by a huge number of factors. It's not as simple as "if nuclear is successful, price is low otherwise it's high". One of those reasons is that when someone is more available you consume more, making price sticky. Also, consider where that comment comes from. It comes from a person who benefits from arguing that nuclear has magical economic powers. So you're saying tha…
The price comment was not about "price is low"; it was about it becoming SO plentiful that the overhead in metering the cost would exceed the revenue and it could be just an on/off subscription This HAS happened with telecom services, where long-distance calls used to even be sometimes only one town over, and were charged by the minute. Toll-free (800)- numbers were a big deal. Now, the network is so successful and c…