Smoking bans are coming: what does the evidence say?
1–10 of 13 posts
Re: Smoking bans are coming: what does the evidence say?
#2Re: Smoking bans are coming: what does the evidence say?
#3Re: Smoking bans are coming: what does the evidence say?
#4The word "freedom" does not appear in the article. The loss of freedom from a smoking ban should at least be acknowledged. Trying to ban smoking will create a black market whose products may be more dangerous than the current ones. Eric Garner died after an arrest for selling single cigarettes from packs without tax stamps. Bans don't enforce themselves. Do we want police going after people selling cigarettes?
Re: Smoking bans are coming: what does the evidence say?
#5“The results are not super clear, but certainly hint towards vaping causing damage to the lungs and other organs,” says Carolyn Baglole, who studies lung disease at the McGill University Health Centre in Montreal, Canada.
I.E. there is no evidence that banning vaping would improve anything. In all likelihood, we would save millions of lives if everybody who smoked switched to vaping.
Before we ban what might be the most effective stop-smoking method ever, I think we should hold off for real scientific results to come in.
Re: Smoking bans are coming: what does the evidence say?
#6The word "freedom" does not appear in the article. The loss of freedom from a smoking ban should at least be acknowledged. Trying to ban smoking will create a black market whose products may be more dangerous than the current ones. Eric Garner died after an arrest for selling single cigarettes from packs without tax stamps. Bans don't enforce themselves. Do we want police going after people selling cigarettes?
Re: Smoking bans are coming: what does the evidence say?
#7Smoking tobacco is older than the US. any chance of a "prohibition" type situation cropping up?
Burning witches is older than the US too, if we're gonna get all argumentum ad antiquitatem in here.
Re: Smoking bans are coming: what does the evidence say?
#8The word "freedom" does not appear in the article. The loss of freedom from a smoking ban should at least be acknowledged. Trying to ban smoking will create a black market whose products may be more dangerous than the current ones. Eric Garner died after an arrest for selling single cigarettes from packs without tax stamps. Bans don't enforce themselves. Do we want police going after people selling cigarettes?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Eric_Garner
> NYPD officers approached Garner on July 17 [2014] on suspicion of selling single cigarettes from packs without tax stamps.
No, we don't want more of that.
Re: Smoking bans are coming: what does the evidence say?
#9Never liked vapes, know too many people who had bad outcomes with side effects from the unstandardized liquids during the initial craze(although this is probably much better now).
Re: Smoking bans are coming: what does the evidence say?
#10Smoking tobacco is older than the US. any chance of a "prohibition" type situation cropping up?
> Smoking tobacco is older than the US. Burning witches is older than the US too, if we're gonna get all argumentum ad antiquitatem in here.