Live data from Hacker News

AI made these movies sharper – critics say it ruined them

nytimes.com

101–110 of 270 posts

Re: AI made these movies sharper – critics say it ruined them

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Up to you! I like to watch the content in its period accurate format.

Wouldn't that be the original film?

So pedantic. Can you access the original film? What is a VHS?

Do you or kstrauser make films? Please enlightening me more on the nuances of personal preference?

Re: AI made these movies sharper – critics say it ruined them

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Up to you! I like to watch the content in its period accurate format.

I watched it in a theater with much better than NTSC resolution. VHS is only period accurate for things released straight to VHS.

I did too. When it was in theater and then 10 more times when I ran a private non-profit theater and ran the VHS through a jank projector setup.

Re: AI made these movies sharper – critics say it ruined them

#103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Abyss in only good on VHS, or laserdisc if you have the setup...

Really? VHS with its grainy 240 x 320 resolution is better than a blu ray?

Yes, on a 28" flat crt sony trinitron from 1995

Re: AI made these movies sharper – critics say it ruined them

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wouldn't that be the original film?

So pedantic. Can you access the original film? What is a VHS? Do you or kstrauser make films? Please enlightening me more on the nuances of personal preference?

Personal preference is fine! Describing VHS as “periodic accurate” as though that was these films’ original format is the silly bit.

Re: AI made these movies sharper – critics say it ruined them

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So pedantic. Can you access the original film? What is a VHS? Do you or kstrauser make films? Please enlightening me more on the nuances of personal preference?

Personal preference is fine! Describing VHS as “periodic accurate” as though that was these films’ original format is the silly bit.

Silly to you. Again, to you.

Since the film does not run in theaters indefinitely and at the time VHS was a common format, among others.

Given film reciprocity and resolution related to period produced film stock and processing techniques, VHS and other reduced resolution formats from the same period, look better, to me! than rescans(4k, which super35 barely supports) and up-resing. Again IMHO because I guess people take this otherwise.

Re: AI made these movies sharper – critics say it ruined them

#107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I get how a film buff might care, and agree the original version should be available, but isn’t there space for people who just want to see the story but experience it with modern levels of image quality? The technical details of technology at some point of time is definitely interesting to some people, but as say the writer or others associated with the creative and less technical aspects of a film I may find the te…

The problem with that is the content is usually shot with the certain definition in mind. If you don't film certain scenes from scratch, they can end up looking weird in higher definition, simply because certain tricks rely on low definition/poor quality, or because you get a mismatch between old VFX and new resolution, for example. It's a widespread issue with the emulation of old games that have been made for reall…

For a specific simple example: multiple Star Trek TV series were shot with the assumption that SDTV resolution would hide all the rough edges of props and fake displays. Watch them in (non-remastered) HD and suddenly it's very obvious how much of the set is painted plywood and cardboard.

Re: AI made these movies sharper – critics say it ruined them

#108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Personal preference is fine! Describing VHS as “periodic accurate” as though that was these films’ original format is the silly bit.

Silly to you. Again, to you. Since the film does not run in theaters indefinitely and at the time VHS was a common format, among others. Given film reciprocity and resolution related to period produced film stock and processing techniques, VHS and other reduced resolution formats from the same period, look better, to me! than rescans(4k, which super35 barely supports) and up-resing. Again IMHO because I guess people…

Silly to you. Again, to you.

What do you mean 'again'? You never said that in your original comment.

Given film reciprocity and resolution related to period produced film stock and processing techniques, VHS and other reduced resolution formats from the same period, look better, to me!

What you're describing is just nostalgia, nothing more. That's fine, no need to rationalize it.

Why stop at VHS? Why not copy it a few times back and forth between tapes?

4k, which super35 barely supports

I agree, but regular blu ray is 2k

Re: AI made these movies sharper – critics say it ruined them

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> most HDR content is too damn dark anyway. It's not, though -- it's entirely the problem with players. Not just software players but also TV's. There are lots of TV shows now that are available in 1080p SDR and in 4K HDR. When you play them both on any player or TV, they should have the same brightness in "regular" scenes like two people talking in a room. They're meant to. HDR is only meant to make a handful of ele…

Also just to piggy back on this, every television I have ever purchased has been calibrated like HOT, SICK ASS from the factory. Step ONE every time I buy a TV is to spend a half an hour or so using tons of calibration images to get it dialed in to a sensible setting, and it's shocking how much a lot of them need changed. Almost every TV comes calibrated to be used as a display unit in the store which means contrast…

Where do you get the reference images, how do you display them on the tv, and to what do you compare them? I guess I should just search how to calibrate a tv.

Re: AI made these movies sharper – critics say it ruined them

#110

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really? VHS with its grainy 240 x 320 resolution is better than a blu ray?

Yes, on a 28" flat crt sony trinitron from 1995

I inherited a 34” flat Sony Trinitron from a roommate moving out. He inherited it from the guy who sold him his house. It was the two inches shy of the largest CRT Sony made, and it was a damn 200 lbs (91 kg) white elephant.

I eventually foisted it off on some deliverymen for free. They didn’t believe me when I told them the weight. When they finally lifted it, it was gratifying to hear one grunt, “Damn. I guess it really is 200 lbs.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FD_Trinitron/WEGA

Post reply on HN