Live data from Hacker News

Making Truth Social Comply with the AGPL

boehs.org

1–10 of 99 posts

Re: Making Truth Social Comply with the AGPL

#6
post #4

Good on them for complying: https://github.com/boehs/truthsocial/tree/main/source Looks like a straightforward ruby on rails app. I don't have a legal background so I'm curious what would have happened if they hadn't complied? Fined in a civil case?

Yes, the SFC (Software Freedom Conservancy) is a charity that provides legal support for free software developers, and actually backed up mastodon in the last instance of this:

https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2021/oct/21/trump-group-agplv...

Re: Making Truth Social Comply with the AGPL

#7

> that the labor they exploit is frequently performed by liberals, queers, socialists, and other groups they’ve sworn to destroy You know... people with significantly different ideologies also write code.

I think the word is “frequently” which isn’t “exclusively” and the subject was “open source,” not code. I don’t think it’s controversial most free software / open source people fall into these categories much to the cryptofascist science denying qanon follower free software nerds dismay.

Re: Making Truth Social Comply with the AGPL

#8

> that the labor they exploit is frequently performed by liberals, queers, socialists, and other groups they’ve sworn to destroy You know... people with significantly different ideologies also write code.

This is a good point because “frequently performed by” means “exclusively performed by”
Post reply on HN