The market need for cheaper solar cells seems to have evaporated, since the vast majority of the cost of solar projects these days is always in labour/land/wiring/inverters/grid connection/maintenance contracts. That means saving a bit of money on the panels in return for lower efficiency is never a good deal.
Labor costs are less when the weight is 10x less.
Roll-to-roll fabricated perovskite solar cells under ambient room conditions
21–30 of 112 posts
Re: Roll-to-roll fabricated perovskite solar cells under ambient room conditions
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some are trying to combine perovskite with silicon solar cells because they specialize at capturing different wavelengths. So-called tandem solar cells.
I wonder what happened to singlet fission cells and other things trying to get around the SQ limit
https://interestingengineering.com/energy/paderborns-new-sol...
Re: Roll-to-roll fabricated perovskite solar cells under ambient room conditions
#23As an outsider, what's the appeal of PeSC? The paper says they are less efficient and harder to manufacture, but also that they are the "next generation". I would have thought the next generation would be more efficient or easier to manufacture or both.
Re: Roll-to-roll fabricated perovskite solar cells under ambient room conditions
#24Re: Roll-to-roll fabricated perovskite solar cells under ambient room conditions
#25The market need for cheaper solar cells seems to have evaporated, since the vast majority of the cost of solar projects these days is always in labour/land/wiring/inverters/grid connection/maintenance contracts. That means saving a bit of money on the panels in return for lower efficiency is never a good deal.
If the materials are cheap enough, we might be able to build them into other stuff that was going to use labor anyway (shingles, asphalt, siding, etc). No idea what the economics of this look like though, and electricians (a pretty expensive form of labor) will need to be involved no matter what, but at least theoretically cheaper cells can also deal with labor costs.
No. None of that ever works. Everyone has the "good idea" of cramming PV into some other product thinking that doing so will somehow reduce labor. It never does. Solar shingles are typical. They sound great but in reality require hundreds or thousands of electrical connections all spread over the moving flexible surface that is a wooden roof. You will be chasing electrical gremlins the moment the temperature shifts. And fixing any of those gremlins will involve penetrating the waterproofing, the core function of any roof. It is far easier to build and maintain a normal roof and then mount dedicated panels atop. The same too with siding. Want solar walls? Build normal walls and hang solar panels on them.
It is like building a computer into a desk. It seems like a great idea that will save space and keep your office tidy. There are lots of youtube videos about such builds. In reality, it is expensive on day one and extremely inconvenient to maintain in the long run. Nobody ever does it twice.
Re: Roll-to-roll fabricated perovskite solar cells under ambient room conditions
#26Re: Roll-to-roll fabricated perovskite solar cells under ambient room conditions
#27As an outsider, what's the appeal of PeSC? The paper says they are less efficient and harder to manufacture, but also that they are the "next generation". I would have thought the next generation would be more efficient or easier to manufacture or both.
Re: Roll-to-roll fabricated perovskite solar cells under ambient room conditions
#28What is "roll-to-roll", in this context?
Re: Roll-to-roll fabricated perovskite solar cells under ambient room conditions
#29With 20% capacity, that’s equivalent to >300,000 Million Tons of Oil (MToE) per year. Current global energy consumption is 14,000 MToE [2].
[1] https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/installed-solar-pv-capaci...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_supply_and_consum...
Re: Roll-to-roll fabricated perovskite solar cells under ambient room conditions
#30What is "roll-to-roll", in this context?