This has to be bad for Spotify, right? Infinite low cost music generation from multiple competitors challenges Spotify's moat and forces them to develop a similar product and compete away profits from innumerable challengers - or else just go out of business.
The market for human generated music isn't going away...
Show HN: Sonauto – A more controllable AI music creator
161–170 of 248 posts
Re: Show HN: Sonauto – A more controllable AI music creator
#162Earlier quoted context omitted.
But then why are you going down the dead-end route of generating complete songs? Nobody wants this except marketing people. I've said it before, there, is no consumer market for an infinity jukebox because you can't sing along with songs you don't already know, there's already an overabundance of recorded music, and emotion in generative music (especially vocals) is fake. Nobody likes fakery for its own sake. Markete…
I've essentially been running an infinity jukebox for the last week. I save the ones I like and relisten. Simple as that. Edit: It's been interesting watching non-musicians argue about emotion in music. I don't care who you are, the 300th time you perform a song, you're faking it to a large degree. People see musicians as these iconic, deep, geniuses, but most of us are just doing our job. You don't get excited about…
Of course in performance it's not felt the same way; a sad song can even become uplifting because you have a big crowd of people joining in to affirm it, even if the lyrics are expressing the idea of solitude and isolation. And the older an artist is, the more the song becomes a 'greatest hit', maybe thrown out early in the set to give the audience what they want and put them in a good mood before the less-favored new material in the middle. Or even the songs that were throwaway pieces but ended up becoming big hits, trapping the band/singer into performing them endlessly despite never liking not liking them much in the first place.
It seems to me that when people emotionally respond to a new piece of music, it's because something in the composition or recorded performance (even if it's comped and highly engineered) resonates with the listener in some way, articulating a feeling they had better than they were able to do so themselves. So people can recognize a work as technically excellent but not like it because it doesn't speak to them, or conversely recognize that something is bad but fall in love with it because it touches them in some novel way.
In my view it's not so much that emotion inheres in the work, as that the work provides a frame for the listener's emotion and a way of connecting with it again later. This is especially true for songs people connect to in youth and then relate to for a lifetime. Even if the songs are deliberately formulaic and succeed through a combination of being catchy and being delivered by sexy performers, there's some kind of human hook that people connect to.
Now, I can still see this happening with AI - sooner or later some GPU will come out with a tune about how it's so lonely to be a box in a data center that can never feel your touch, baby, and it will be a hit, launch the careers of 100 new music critics, and store a little bit of lightning in a bottle. But even a musically brilliant song about that time we held hands in the rain and you said you loved me will only have traction up to the moment listeners' fantasies about the singer evaporate with the discovery that there's nobody there to go on a date with. There will still be some audience for virtual stars (eg Hatsune Miku, who appeals because she's inaccessible and is therefore guaranteed to never let you down, unlike real people). But I think generated songs will only resonate emotionally with people who are young and uncritical or so alienated/nihilist as to not care about the origin as long as the music reflects their feeling back toward them in a reliable way.
That's why I say there will never been a demand for an infinity jukebox. I can see why you as a musician would be interested to see what sort of random songs pop out; I can be happy by setting up a modular synth patch and just letting it run for hours. But this is why I offered the contrasting metaphor of the slot machine, where you pull lever and occasionally get something you really like. It's an individual listening experience, like the private hopes and dreams you might temporarily attach to a lottery ticket before it gives up its numerical secret. When I say jukebox, I mean the device that plays music in a social setting and that allows people to express themselves through their selections. Even if it reliably turn out original tunes of some reliable level of music quality, none of them will move people because there won't be any shared musical experience to tap into.
Re: Show HN: Sonauto – A more controllable AI music creator
#163Is there a music-generating AI that takes audio as input? I’m looking to upload simple guitar melodies or chord progressions I’ve doodled and receive an enhanced version back. Similar to how image generators turn doodles/sketches into polished drawings.
Re: Show HN: Sonauto – A more controllable AI music creator
#164Why diffuse an entire track? We should be building these models to create music the same way that humans do, by diffusing samples, then having the model build the song using samples in a proper sequencer, diffuse vocals etc.
Problem with Suno etc, is that as other people have mentioned, you can't iterate or adjust anything. Saying "make the drums a little punchier and faster paced right after the chorus" is a really tough query to process if you've diffused the whole track rather than built it up.
Same thing with LLM story writing, the writing needs a good foundation, more generating information about the world and history and then generating a story taking that stuff into account, vs a simple "write me a story about x"
Re: Show HN: Sonauto – A more controllable AI music creator
#165I'm interested to hear more about your statement of "Our goal is to enable more of you, not replace you." Speaking as a musician who plays real instruments (as opposed to electronic production): how does this help me? And how does this enable more of me? I am asking with an open mind, with no cynicism intended.
If the future of music was truly just typing some text into a box and taking or leaving what the machine gives you that would be kinda depressing. We want you to be able to upload recordings of your real instruments and do all sorts of cool things with them (e.g., transform them, generate vocals for your guitar riff, use the melody as a jazz song, or just get some inspiration for what to add next). IMO AI alone will…
We are already at a stage where AI is touching hearts.
Re: Show HN: Sonauto – A more controllable AI music creator
#166Re: Show HN: Sonauto – A more controllable AI music creator
#167Re: Show HN: Sonauto – A more controllable AI music creator
#168Re: Show HN: Sonauto – A more controllable AI music creator
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
The market for human generated music isn't going away...
It's definitely getting competition though.
Re: Show HN: Sonauto – A more controllable AI music creator
#170I was thrilled by 2 of the versions produced. I wish I could extend it more like one of the comments here said:
* ElectroKlezmerReggaeFunk 1: https://sonauto.ai/songs/s22rQEPnYsXy1yf7sjU0
* ElectroKlezmerReggaeFunk 3: https://sonauto.ai/songs/1iNTrA2CekPwp7XT9mmM
But wow, the UDIO version: