China actually adopted the 8-hour workday in 1930 ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight-hour_day#China ). The 996 policy is a regression which needs to be fought by organized labor, the same way organized labor had to fight (and sometimes die) to get the 8-hour workday.
>The 996 policy is a regression which needs to be fought by organized labor
There's no organised labor in China; all unions are banned, except of course for the communist party.
China actually adopted the 8-hour workday in 1930 ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight-hour_day#China ). The 996 policy is a regression which needs to be fought by organized labor, the same way organized labor had to fight (and sometimes die) to get the 8-hour workday.
I would like to see how quickly Union organizers get disappeared in the People's Republic of China.
Isn't that what the Communist Party is supposed to be?
So, I talked to someone who had worked at AliBaba for a bit (Son Luong Ngoc) and learned a lot. Some of the 996 is related to the company campus providing everything at a pretty low cost and a sort of presentism where being around is rewarded. All that plus the jobs are considered great jobs within China, and there is cut-throat performance competition process. Also, I think sleeping at work, taking a nap while waiti…
I thought everyone would have assumed this is what 996 was anyway. What else could it be? It does not seem any different than the finance/law situation in NYC.
I just don't get how knowledge workers can slave away like that. I can be productive for 12-15 hours a day when the conditions are just right, but usually they aren't and after a few hours I need to switch to something less productive than actual coding. Do employers really see any measurable improvement in volume (let alone quality) of output after 30 hours a week?
The trick is, most work doesn't require you to be super productive. For example you could literally sleep through a lengthy meeting.
This is the reason why Chinese products are beating everyone else, and it's also a reason why we need to impose tariff on Chinese products made by workers in inhumane working conditions, e.g. 996.
> This is the reason why Chinese products are beating everyone else
And you wonder why China is experiencing brain drain. Rest of world is moving toward 4-day work week and these guys think their citizens are dumb enough to slave away their lives.
The rest of the world will look to use 4 day work week as a way to put downward pressure on salaries. China hasn't really needed to put too much downward pressure on salaries.
Can you please elaborate on "downward pressure". Because the way I see it, 4day work week should actually increase the salaries, not reduce it. The way I see - if there is work for 3200 hrs. - it could either be done by one person in 80 weeks (current setup), OR 100 weeks in new setup. Assuming next that velocity should remain the same to keep competitiveness, it's gonna require you to hire not 0.25, but probably 0.5 person for one day free. Hence demand increase for employees. No?
This is the reason why Chinese products are beating everyone else, and it's also a reason why we need to impose tariff on Chinese products made by workers in inhumane working conditions, e.g. 996.
> Chinese products are beating everyone else I suspect the greedy business executives in the west insisting upon a race to the bottom on cost etc. have more to do with it.
Without a nationwide tariff to level the playing field, how do you expect a business executive to compete with other businesses?
This is the reason why Chinese products are beating everyone else, and it's also a reason why we need to impose tariff on Chinese products made by workers in inhumane working conditions, e.g. 996.
It really isn’t… Chinese products are beating everyone else because their labor costs are cheaper, period. In the case of newer industries like electric cars, because they are heavily subsidized by the state. I won’t get into the debate of whether this needs to be protected against… Possibly, but a very complex topic. According to the article 996 applies mostly to software products where America is still absolute king of the hill.
The trick is, most work doesn't require you to be super productive. For example you could literally sleep through a lengthy meeting.
You can, but that’s still work time.
Yeah, that's why 996 kills people slowly. 996 is taking away your own time for the company, and most likely in a not so productive way.
So you don't get the refresh, the first 1-2 companies which employs you get the most benefit because you are not drained yet, but companies later in the line got a used battery almost completely drained -- and that's why China also has the 35 yrs old rule.