Live data from Hacker News

Beeper acquired by Automattic

blog.beeper.com

271–280 of 310 posts

Re: Beeper acquired by Automattic

#271

Isn't this the joke from The Office with WOOPH or whatever it was... and an old program called Pidgin? Nothing innovative here that's crazy

Haha I was thinking about that, but the joke is actually the reverse of this. When someone sends you a WUPHF, you receive it on every medium. Phone, email, fax, text. Beeper does the opposite, anytime you receive something on one of these platforms, it consolidates it to the Beeper app

So a FHPUW, then.

Re: Beeper acquired by Automattic

#273
I guess it's good to join forces on this. However, I really hope the Texts app on Mac will survive this merge as it is lightyears ahead of the UI insult that Beeper is. I migrated away from Beeper to get rid of the ugly interface and in order to not depend on bridges on some server somewhere (yes, I can host them myself, but who wants to?) anymore.

Re: Beeper acquired by Automattic

#274

Earlier quoted context omitted.

IIRC matrix and its foundation? were hurting for funding a while back and might yet still be. Did Beeper contribute to it or does Automattic plan to?

We did: https://matrix.org/blog/2023/06/beeper-joins-the-foundation/

Bravo!

Re: Beeper acquired by Automattic

#275
post #54

Automattic sometimes acquires companies and does nothing with them - like with Simplenote. As an early Beeper user, I am disappointed!

> sometimes acquires companies and does nothing

Honestly, Automattic is probably one of the best exit routes for them. They have a history of being a good steward of their acquisitions. Compared to other companies that either shut them down or enshittify their products as a manner of course, it's valuable when a company can simply maintain their acquisitions alive and keep them running, at least giving them a chance to grow.

Re: Beeper acquired by Automattic

#276
post #180

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No matter what, as long as we continue to communicate with each other, messaging will never die. Individual messaging platforms will come and go but the idea of instant messaging has existed for about as long as the internet. $175M might be a steal if Beeper gets more mass market appeal.

Yeah, my first response was going to be that the paid messaging app business model hasn't worked that entire time. But what we've learned from Whatsapp is that there may be other ways to monetize (Whatsapp Business). Still not an obvious bet IMO but you're right that owning the messaging layer is valuable.

These apps are a gateway drug onto the Matrix protocol thereby eliminating the monopoly position of trillion dollar (evil) companies like WhatsApp (Meta).

Re: Beeper acquired by Automattic

#277

How much of this is a long-term bet that the US DOJ's antitrust case against Apple (at least the iMessage-specific argument) will result in the forced opening up of the platform, such that Beeper (now Automattic) will sustainably function?

I'm surprised Whatsapp hasn't gone after them yet. They are famous for going after small independant open source maintainers for similar projects.

Re: Beeper acquired by Automattic

#279

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I still choose WP over Wix or SquareSpace when given the option. Self hosting a bunch of WP sites on a DigitalOcean instance and mirroring them all through CloudFlare is probably the cheapest way to run high traffic read-only sites. Toss in ServerPilot and you can spin up sites about as quickly as you could doing the Wix onboarding. My prediction is that by 2030 Wordpress will be just as popular as it is today :)

Static HTML is even cheaper. I don't understand how some people can't think outside of CMS land

Because you need either to write your own html or to use a static site generator, none of which are accessible solutions to normal people. WordPress (.com) is accessible to my grandmother.

Re: Beeper acquired by Automattic

#280
post #51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Automattic does like $200~$300M in revenue.

That doesn't sound much considering they employ like 2k people, that's $100k per worker and considering they're tech workers that would just cover their pay

As long as they can sustain themselves and/or grow without profits, who cares ?

Also they hire all around the world where $100k/yr is the exception and not the norm.

Post reply on HN