Live data from Hacker News

'Lavender': The AI machine directing Israel's bombing in Gaza

972mag.com

541–550 of 1001 posts

Re: 'Lavender': The AI machine directing Israel's bombing in Gaza

#541
post #329
post #274

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, that's why we merged those threads into this one. From https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html : Submitters: " Please submit the original source. If a post reports on something found on another site, submit the latter. " - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html Readers might still find it helpful to read both pieces, of course.

972 this is leftist "blog magazine" with questionably sourced material. while there might be some truth to core claim of automated system (which IDF confirmed that exists), rest of claims probably outcome of "broken phone". But everybody will use it as statement of undeniable fact in order to evolve as usual discussion into "genocidal Israel indiscriminately killing civilians in droves and performs ethnic cleaning an…

What evidence would you accept that would prove the allegations sufficiently to change your mind?

Re: 'Lavender': The AI machine directing Israel's bombing in Gaza

#542

How does this system get the input? Are Palestinians using IDF tapped cell towers? Or is it possible to use roaming towers for this? Is e.g. Google or Facebook involved on a mobile OS or app level? Maybe backdoors local to the area? It seems like the whole cell phone infrastructure need to be torn down.

> Are Palestinians using IDF tapped cell towers?

That's my understanding. That the whole of the Gaza strip is essentially watched under the equivalent of stingrays and all traffic out is monitored with room 641a style taps.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stingray_phone_tracker

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_641A

Re: 'Lavender': The AI machine directing Israel's bombing in Gaza

#543
post #430

Years ago, scholars (such as Didier Bigo) have already raised concerns about the targeting of individuals merely based on (indirect) association with a "terrorist" or "criminal". Originally used in the context of surveillance (see Snowden revelations), such systems would target anyone who would be e.g. less than 3-steps away from an identified individual, thereby removing any sense of due process or targeted surveill…

> Everyone else is a civilian that can only be directly targeted when and for as long as they directly participate in hostilities, such as by taking up arms, planning military operations, laying down mines, etc. There is some incredible magic that often happens: as soon as anyone is targeted and killed, they immediately transform from civilians to "collaborators", "terrorists", "militants" etc. Of course everything i…

In Norway it is rather the other way:

We all know (if we stop and think) that a person can be both a teacher and a terrorist.

But according to media here almost every victim except top Hamas brass seems to be referred to by their whatever else they were besides terrorists and the terrorists (or even just soldier) part get hushed down.

Re: 'Lavender': The AI machine directing Israel's bombing in Gaza

#544
post #329
post #274

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, that's why we merged those threads into this one. From https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html : Submitters: " Please submit the original source. If a post reports on something found on another site, submit the latter. " - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html Readers might still find it helpful to read both pieces, of course.

972 this is leftist "blog magazine" with questionably sourced material. while there might be some truth to core claim of automated system (which IDF confirmed that exists), rest of claims probably outcome of "broken phone". But everybody will use it as statement of undeniable fact in order to evolve as usual discussion into "genocidal Israel indiscriminately killing civilians in droves and performs ethnic cleaning an…

Mainstream israeli television pretty much agrees with the description you put in quotes. It's just that they think it's jolly good and something to be proud of, whereas you seem to disagree with that?

Re: 'Lavender': The AI machine directing Israel's bombing in Gaza

#545

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hm OK, I read this a bit differently. I read these sections: > One source stated that human personnel often served only as a “rubber stamp” for the machine’s decisions, adding that, normally, they would personally devote only about “20 seconds” to each target before authorizing a bombing — just to make sure the Lavender-marked target is male. > According to the sources, the army knew that the minimal human supervisio…

> What is the "zero-error" alternative approach for dropping bombs in a war, or firing rockets for that matter? Honestly, I'm not sure. Obviously humans make errors of all sorts as well, and even make intentionally unethical decisions. I think the horror of this situation is that it makes war easier to wage. Accepting that all war has costs measured in blood, we should want less war. However, those in control of mili…

Eh, some people actually have different visions for the world. They'll elect people who are abhorrent to western liberal values over and over again. I don't know what a new election in Gaza would yield, but I don't think it can be a given that giving X group dignity and self-determination will necessarily tilt them toward western liberal outcomes.

Re: 'Lavender': The AI machine directing Israel's bombing in Gaza

#546
post #454

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I imagine you get to tune the probability window of "person is >90% likely a Hamas terrorist" and choose how many innocent people you kill. Who set the window? "Hamas terrorist" criteria: a male of fighting age, give higher weight to those congregating with others of fighting age. Basically take out a generation of Palestinian men and you're all set. Lovely. >This sentence is horrifically dystopian... "in order to sa…

A war that would only kill 10% civilians would be a massive improvement over any recent conflict.

Well, that was a 10% failure rate supposedly on selecting the primary target of the attack.

The attack itself was allowed to have a 15x to 100x number of civilians killed depending on the supposed importance of the target.

Re: 'Lavender': The AI machine directing Israel's bombing in Gaza

#547
Meanwhile China is working on automated building facilities which can make 1,000 cruise missiles per day:

https://twitter.com/Aryan_warlord/status/1774859594747273711

Perfect match for a targeting AI, the AI could even customize each missile as it's being built according to the target it selected.

Re: 'Lavender': The AI machine directing Israel's bombing in Gaza

#548

I'm disturbed by the idea that an AI could be used to make decisions that could proactively kill someone. (Presumably computer already make decisions that passively kill people by, for example, navigating a self-driving car.) Though there was a human sign-off in this case, it seems one step away from people being killed by robots with zero human intervention which is about one step away from the plot of Terminator. I…

> B., a senior officer who used Lavender, echoed to +972 and Local Call that in the current war, officers were not required to independently review the AI system’s assessments, in order to save time and enable the mass production of human targets without hindrances. > “Everything was statistical, everything was neat — it was very dry,” B. said. He noted that this lack of supervision was permitted despite internal che…

90% is a BS number . Computed basis what ? What is the baseline how did they benchmark . Is there any data whatsoever to back this claim ?

They just spout a high number that is not 100% (clearly civilians are being killed publicly undeniably ) claiming 100% would be too obviously ridiculous.

More than half of 32,000+ (more under the rubble) killed are woman and children, Hamas is still quite able to fight, hardly any hostages has been recovered .

Israel labels any sort of civilian organization as hamas including journalists, medical and aid staff. 200 UN staff and 100 journalists are dead so far . Israel’s argument is UNWRA terrorist aiding and journalists were also secretly Hamas and doing non journalistic stuff when killed so they include them in legitimate targets .

If you consider everyone is Hamas unless otherwise proven then 90% is possible .

There is no realistic way an algorithm was designed factoring in the level of destruction of infrastructure never seen in any real world data and also benchmarked accurately.

Re: 'Lavender': The AI machine directing Israel's bombing in Gaza

#549
post #522
post #278

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a typical phenomenon when a topic is divisive, and the Israel/Gaza topic is one of the most divisive. Edit: We sometimes turn off flags when an article contains significant new information and also has at least some chance of providing a substantive basis for discussion. I haven't read the current article yet but it seems like a reasonable candidate for this, so I turned off the flags. For anyone who wants mo…

> This is a typical phenomenon when a topic is divisive, and the Israel/Gaza topic is one of the most divisive. Kind of related thought - is there a topic you think is more divisive? And also, is there some way that this is measured officially or unofficially?

No and in fact my comment originally said "the current topic is perhaps the most divisive HN has ever seen".

Not measured, though, if you mean some kind of quantitative approach.

Re: 'Lavender': The AI machine directing Israel's bombing in Gaza

#550
post #367

Israel's evil keeps taking me by surprise. I guess when people go down the path of dehumanization there are truly no limits to what they are ready to do. But what is even sadder is that the supposedly morally superior western world is entirely bribed and blackmailed to stand behind Israel. And then you have countries like Germany where you get thrown in jail for being upset at Israel.

> And then you have countries like Germany where you get thrown in jail for being upset at Israel. Back in 2002 or so, a friend of mine swore blind that an American had been arrested for wearing a "give whirled peas a chance" T-shirt — which is an anecdotal way of saying: are you sure you've got the full story? I'm learning German by listening to „Langsam Gesprochene Nachrichten“ by Deutsche Welle, and it definitely…

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%E2%80%93Hamas_war_prote...

>In Berlin, authorities banned a pro-Palestinian rally from being held.[176] A number of spontaneous demonstrations protesting the bombing of Gaza took place across the country, but were forcefully broken up by police.[177] Germany banned fundraising, the displaying of the Palestinian flag and the wearing of the keffiyeh.[13]

>In Neukölln, a neighborhood of Berlin, pro-Palestinian protesters described police crackdowns on protest that were "shocking and violent".[180]

Post reply on HN