Somewhat related tool: pproxy, can, among many other things, "convert" different tunnel protocols into each other. Also features routing capabilities. I used it to turn an SSH SOCKS5 into an HTTP proxy. https://github.com/moreati/pproxy
Wireproxy: WireGuard client that exposes itself as a HTTP/SOCKS5 proxy
51–60 of 67 posts
Re: Wireproxy: WireGuard client that exposes itself as a HTTP/SOCKS5 proxy
#52Re: Wireproxy: WireGuard client that exposes itself as a HTTP/SOCKS5 proxy
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
TIL multi-account containers allow per-container proxy settings! Am I correct in thinking it needs a separate extension to set that up, like this one? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/container-pro... Edit: I was not correct, which is apparently grounds for downvotes now.
You can be downvoted for anything. Walk it off :)
Re: Wireproxy: WireGuard client that exposes itself as a HTTP/SOCKS5 proxy
#54This hybrid approach addresses a significant user pain point - the ease of routing specific traffic through VPN tunnels. However, while Wireproxy's utility in personal and small-scale deployments is evident, its scalability and security in larger, enterprise-level applications warrant further scrutiny. The reliance on user-space operation, though advantageous for certain aspects of performance and compatibility, intr…
Re: Wireproxy: WireGuard client that exposes itself as a HTTP/SOCKS5 proxy
#55Re: Wireproxy: WireGuard client that exposes itself as a HTTP/SOCKS5 proxy
#56This hybrid approach addresses a significant user pain point - the ease of routing specific traffic through VPN tunnels. However, while Wireproxy's utility in personal and small-scale deployments is evident, its scalability and security in larger, enterprise-level applications warrant further scrutiny. The reliance on user-space operation, though advantageous for certain aspects of performance and compatibility, intr…
One is a connection allowing you access to a private network for whatever purposes, which is what this feature enables.
The other is routing ALL your networking through it to disguise where you're located.
Confusing and confounding the two leads to disaster.
Re: Wireproxy: WireGuard client that exposes itself as a HTTP/SOCKS5 proxy
#57https://github.com/dariost/soks works better for what I needed to do with wireguard. It does more or less the same thing but it reuses an existing wireguard interface. I detailed my use in this blog post https://www.nicoco.fr/blog/2023/09/10/wireguard/ (yes, shameless plug).
Re: Wireproxy: WireGuard client that exposes itself as a HTTP/SOCKS5 proxy
#58Neat! This is a great replacement for my SSH tunnels when I need a different IP. Somewhat related tool: pproxy, can, among many other things, "convert" different tunnel protocols into each other. Also features routing capabilities. I used it to turn an SSH SOCKS5 into an HTTP proxy. https://github.com/moreati/pproxy
Re: Wireproxy: WireGuard client that exposes itself as a HTTP/SOCKS5 proxy
#59Re: Wireproxy: WireGuard client that exposes itself as a HTTP/SOCKS5 proxy
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
TIL multi-account containers allow per-container proxy settings! Am I correct in thinking it needs a separate extension to set that up, like this one? https://addons.mozilla.org/en-GB/firefox/addon/container-pro... Edit: I was not correct, which is apparently grounds for downvotes now.
No separate extension needed; it’s right there in the container settings now! Somebody has the detailed steps in a sibling comment.