A16Z blogs are just glorified marketing
21–30 of 150 posts
Re: A16Z blogs are just glorified marketing
#22I have no idea what the OPs company does, but I do agree with the title.
Re: A16Z blogs are just glorified marketing
#23Most "news" in the tech industry is funded by VCs, if you follow the money. It's not a terrible fact, but it's one to be aware of. All the `"X Technology" [that Y VC firm has recently raised $4Bn of capital to chase, cough cough] has massive potential to upend [big industry], here's why` articles are compensated-for boosterism. There's still signal in there, although it's mostly in the meta-facts of what they choose…
Re: A16Z blogs are just glorified marketing
#24Some of us do it more than others, depending on the topic or point of the post. Market maps do it a lot more than position pieces, as you'd expect, for instance. Anyways, the feedback is good.
Re: A16Z blogs are just glorified marketing
#25https://www.npr.org/2021/06/25/1010066447/stung-by-media-cov...
Re: A16Z blogs are just glorified marketing
#26Re: A16Z blogs are just glorified marketing
#27Re: A16Z blogs are just glorified marketing
#28Not all of them are marketing. Some of them expose his belief system. After “The Techno-Optimist Manifesto” it’s very hard for me to take him seriously again.
a16z is not one person.
So the obvious assumption is that Ben and the other leadership is supportive of it.
Re: A16Z blogs are just glorified marketing
#29Re: A16Z blogs are just glorified marketing
#30I'm not sure why the author takes such umbrage at A16Z promoting its own portfolio companies. It is their blog after all.