Live data from Hacker News

Dan Lynch Has Died (SRI, Arpanet, Internet)

nytimes.com

31–40 of 43 posts

Re: Dan Lynch Has Died (SRI, Arpanet, Internet)

#31
post #6

Why are there many people dying the last few days? I am reading hacker news every day, but it feels like there’s at least a death note or two a day currently

The boomers are dying. Life expectancy is 76 years in the US. Which reminds me, that middle-age is actually 38. I'm halfway done with my life. Yikes!

The way I look at it is that I was, in hindsight, barely sentient for the first ~25 years, so that means we've only really gotten to live for 10-20 years!

Re: Dan Lynch Has Died (SRI, Arpanet, Internet)

#32
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The number of people dying will increase two score and ten years [2] after a baby boom [1] like the United States post-war baby boom. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_boom [2] https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Psalm%2090%3A10...

How is that bible verse relevant exactly?

I wasn't aware of it, but found it extremely interesting. A topic I find particularly interesting is the illusion of longevity many have in modern times. Look at the Ancient Greeks and most of them lived 70-100 years of age, with a median age beyond 70. [1] The typical argument is of a survivorship bias, but most/all of the Greeks we know of today would still have gone in history if they had died many decades prior.

You can also look at other samples like the Founding Fathers of the US. Most lived past 70, and some even lived beyond 90. The only people who died before 60 were Alexander Hamilton, killed in a duel and John Hancock, died of gout - which can be caused by things including excessive drinking. There was indeed a very low life expectancy in the past, but it was 100% due to infant mortality. If one child dies in infancy, and the other lives to 80, then you have a life expectancy at birth of 40.

That the Bible itself also noted this, is extremely interesting. Not even from a religious perspective, but from a historic one. It's really interesting to think about. As an adult today, you have a similar life expectancy to an (upper class) adult from thousands of years ago. There are many implications that one can apply to modern life. For instance it's safe to say that their dietary/lifestyle choices are very much worth considering, if not emulating.

[1] - https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18359748/

Re: Dan Lynch Has Died (SRI, Arpanet, Internet)

#33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The boomers are dying. Life expectancy is 76 years in the US. Which reminds me, that middle-age is actually 38. I'm halfway done with my life. Yikes!

The way I look at it is that I was, in hindsight, barely sentient for the first ~25 years, so that means we've only really gotten to live for 10-20 years!

I like this argument, I just wonder if the bar rises over time. Do you think that in 5 years you will say you were barely sentient for the first ~30 years?

Re: Dan Lynch Has Died (SRI, Arpanet, Internet)

#34
post #6

Why are there many people dying the last few days? I am reading hacker news every day, but it feels like there’s at least a death note or two a day currently

The boomers are dying. Life expectancy is 76 years in the US. Which reminds me, that middle-age is actually 38. I'm halfway done with my life. Yikes!

It does make me sad sometimes. But I find great comfort knowing we were all along for the journey together. Whether we knew each other or not, I’m glad to have shared this space time with you and others.

We are here because of those before us. Those after us will be there because of us. Good stuff.

Re: Dan Lynch Has Died (SRI, Arpanet, Internet)

#35

If anyone has the means, it may be worthwhile to invest in life extension research. We’re losing more great minds every year.

This comment perplexes me. Do you think there is no research happening? In that view, what do you think disease research, anti-aging research, and medical/pharmacological research is? And do you suppose that there are a finite amount of great minds, that the current set of them dying off implies that we'll be left without any soon enough, or that the current set needs to be maintained forever? As important as his work was, do we need to keep him around forever as some sort of special class of person?

Re: Dan Lynch Has Died (SRI, Arpanet, Internet)

#36

If anyone has the means, it may be worthwhile to invest in life extension research. We’re losing more great minds every year.

And great minds are born every year. Or rather with the potential to develope a great mind, if we help them with the right conditions.

Re: Dan Lynch Has Died (SRI, Arpanet, Internet)

#37
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The way I look at it is that I was, in hindsight, barely sentient for the first ~25 years, so that means we've only really gotten to live for 10-20 years!

I like this argument, I just wonder if the bar rises over time. Do you think that in 5 years you will say you were barely sentient for the first ~30 years?

I've also wondered the exact same thing. Suppose we'll see!

Re: Dan Lynch Has Died (SRI, Arpanet, Internet)

#38
post #36

If anyone has the means, it may be worthwhile to invest in life extension research. We’re losing more great minds every year.

And great minds are born every year. Or rather with the potential to develope a great mind, if we help them with the right conditions.

This is something I think about quite a bit: There are about 8 billion people on this earth. Of the 8 billion, I would argue only 1 in 10 (800 million) have their basic needs met and a decent education. This is the pool of people most of our innovations, business and scientific come from.

Imagine what would happen if we doubled or tripled that number.

How many more companies founded, inventions created, or if you care about art, new creations never imagined.

We really MUST do better, it is in all our best interests.

Re: Dan Lynch Has Died (SRI, Arpanet, Internet)

#39
post #35

If anyone has the means, it may be worthwhile to invest in life extension research. We’re losing more great minds every year.

This comment perplexes me. Do you think there is no research happening? In that view, what do you think disease research, anti-aging research, and medical/pharmacological research is? And do you suppose that there are a finite amount of great minds, that the current set of them dying off implies that we'll be left without any soon enough, or that the current set needs to be maintained forever? As important as his wor…

Isn't it par for the course? This site is really the worst, worse than Tumblr, twitter, whatever. Because there's absolutely zero self awareness.

Re: Dan Lynch Has Died (SRI, Arpanet, Internet)

#40
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This comment perplexes me. Do you think there is no research happening? In that view, what do you think disease research, anti-aging research, and medical/pharmacological research is? And do you suppose that there are a finite amount of great minds, that the current set of them dying off implies that we'll be left without any soon enough, or that the current set needs to be maintained forever? As important as his wor…

Isn't it par for the course? This site is really the worst, worse than Tumblr, twitter, whatever. Because there's absolutely zero self awareness.

I think people should eventually die. I don’t think that’s a controversial viewpoint. I don’t want billionaires turning into trillionaires simply because they took their money, threw it into index funds, and waited a few hundred years.
Post reply on HN