Live data from Hacker News

First Council of Nicaea

en.wikipedia.org

11–20 of 65 posts

Re: First Council of Nicaea

#11
post #6
post #5

[flagged]

Yes.

Since I can't reply to a dead comment:

As long as people are respectful and follow the guidelines, sure.

Edit: your other replies are not respectful and seem to violate the guidelines.

Edit 2: Anyone can be respectful to anyone else regardless of beliefs. Choosing not to be respectful doesn't say anything about the beliefs, it speaks as to the person being disrespectful. This will be my last edit/reply.

Re: First Council of Nicaea

#12
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes.

Since I can't reply to a dead comment: As long as people are respectful and follow the guidelines, sure. Edit: your other replies are not respectful and seem to violate the guidelines. Edit 2: Anyone can be respectful to anyone else regardless of beliefs. Choosing not to be respectful doesn't say anything about the beliefs, it speaks as to the person being disrespectful. This will be my last edit/reply.

[flagged]

Re: First Council of Nicaea

#13
Not sure why this is on HN. Council of Nicaea is a favorite flashpoint for conspiracy theory people. But in reality it wasn't all that special. It was just one event in many that shaped Christianity. Basically its like a ISO Standards meeting. Lots of old guys making obscure arguments based on interpretations of obscure text about things that essentially don't matter outside of a bunch of nerds.

The connection between their arguments and the actual resulting Christian practice is tenuous at best or more likely irrelevant.

And all things considered its pretty late in the formation of Christianity of the Church. By 325 the church was pretty unified on the most important things.

Its just more famous because we have slightly better documentation for this history. We have almost nothing for the first century. In the second century our records are incredibly spotty and fragmented. It gets a bit better in the 3rd and 4rd century.

There is so much interesting 'Christian' history of the early 2 centuries that people are totally unaware off. If you want to see into some of that strange history, you might want to read something like: "Found Christianities: Remaking the World of the Second Century CE"

Re: First Council of Nicaea

#14

Thought the article says the council 'settled' christology, it still took hundreds of years before it was popularly resolved: for, at least, the first 500 years of christianity jesus was widely regarded as something more like a demigod. This fairly clearly what Paul thought; with Luke likely believing just in a messianic role. Early christianity is perhaps best seen as greeking of judaism: god the father is zeus, the…

There is no clear 'early Christianity'. By the first time we have any evidence, there are already many different interpretations.

Re: First Council of Nicaea

#15
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Since I can't reply to a dead comment: As long as people are respectful and follow the guidelines, sure. Edit: your other replies are not respectful and seem to violate the guidelines. Edit 2: Anyone can be respectful to anyone else regardless of beliefs. Choosing not to be respectful doesn't say anything about the beliefs, it speaks as to the person being disrespectful. This will be my last edit/reply.

[flagged]

Both 'why is this on HN' (right in the site guidelines) and 'let's start a religious flamewar' are things to avoid here. If you don't like the topic, read another post. If you think it doesn't belong on HN, flag it or email hn@ycombinator.com with your concerns.

Re: First Council of Nicaea

#16
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes.

Since I can't reply to a dead comment: As long as people are respectful and follow the guidelines, sure. Edit: your other replies are not respectful and seem to violate the guidelines. Edit 2: Anyone can be respectful to anyone else regardless of beliefs. Choosing not to be respectful doesn't say anything about the beliefs, it speaks as to the person being disrespectful. This will be my last edit/reply.

[flagged]

Re: First Council of Nicaea

#19
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Since I can't reply to a dead comment: As long as people are respectful and follow the guidelines, sure. Edit: your other replies are not respectful and seem to violate the guidelines. Edit 2: Anyone can be respectful to anyone else regardless of beliefs. Choosing not to be respectful doesn't say anything about the beliefs, it speaks as to the person being disrespectful. This will be my last edit/reply.

[flagged]

Can you just stop? It's really a much worse thing than whatever your problem with a wikipedia article is. There's reams of mod commentary about it. https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=false&qu...

Re: First Council of Nicaea

#20
post #15
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Both 'why is this on HN' (right in the site guidelines) and 'let's start a religious flamewar' are things to avoid here. If you don't like the topic, read another post. If you think it doesn't belong on HN, flag it or email hn@ycombinator.com with your concerns.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN