[dead]
Thoughts on the Future of Software Development
431–434 of 434 posts
Re: Thoughts on the Future of Software Development
#432[dead]
Re: Thoughts on the Future of Software Development
#433[dead]
Re: Thoughts on the Future of Software Development
#434Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't think COBOL's dream was to generate enormous amounts of assembly code that users would then have to maintain (in assembly!) and producing differently wrong results every time you ran it.
It may not have been the dream, but the reality is many COBOL systems have been binary-patched to fix issues so many times that the original source may not be a useful guide to how the thing actually works.
Can you share any more info on this?