Live data from Hacker News

IrfanView

irfanview.com

111–120 of 341 posts

Re: IrfanView

#111

Maybe I’ll get some hate for this, but years ago when I worked at a civil engineering firm this was the default image viewer IT had mapped every image file to open with - it was a nightmare! Every coworker I had (myself included) would constantly complain about the number of times they had to change to [literally anything else]. There were three distinct things I remember we all hated: 1. The image never opened full…

And not once in all this time did you open settings and change these behaviours (which you can)? Weird.

Re: IrfanView

#112
this ... and its text file counterpart ... Notepad++ ... glorious Windows 95. sounds strange but one reason why I'm now on Linux (Mint Cinnamon) is because I liked Windows 95 and XP so much. it's practically the same UI. no tile nonsense. a task bar. a start menu. a good ole desktop. beautiful. (and I also want to mention I did at least once donate to IrfanView / https://www.irfanview.com/main_support_engl.htm)

Re: IrfanView

#113
post #54

I wish this program was either open source, or had a plugin API.

I think it must have some plugin API as it has plenty of plugins, but it seems for details you need to contact developer.

Re: IrfanView

#114

Why are most comments referring to having used this in the past tense? I was under the impression that it was still the best image viewer in town, on Windows at least

Because many HN readers have moved on from Windows.

Re: IrfanView

#115

Maybe I’ll get some hate for this, but years ago when I worked at a civil engineering firm this was the default image viewer IT had mapped every image file to open with - it was a nightmare! Every coworker I had (myself included) would constantly complain about the number of times they had to change to [literally anything else]. There were three distinct things I remember we all hated: 1. The image never opened full…

And not once in all this time did you open settings and change these behaviours (which you can)? Weird.

Not once in all that time did I consider using a program with hostile default settings. Weird how hard this might be for an image viewer.

Re: IrfanView

#116

I've been using IrfanView since at least 1997, if not earlier in 1996. I still use IrfanView to this day. It's my Swiss knife for a lot of simple photo editing work (cropping, resizing, padding, text-adding, etc), batch-processing, and for browsing single photos through directories. It's not just good, it's way faster than the bloated alternatives. To top it off, IrfanView works beautifully on my Linux via Wine, and…

How do you get it on macOS?

They're doing it via Wine.

Re: IrfanView

#117

I've been using IrfanView since at least 1997, if not earlier in 1996. I still use IrfanView to this day. It's my Swiss knife for a lot of simple photo editing work (cropping, resizing, padding, text-adding, etc), batch-processing, and for browsing single photos through directories. It's not just good, it's way faster than the bloated alternatives. To top it off, IrfanView works beautifully on my Linux via Wine, and…

How do you get it on macOS?

If it's for non-commercial use, you might find this a spritual equivalent, cross-platform:

https://www.xnview.com/en/xnviewmp/

Re: IrfanView

#118

When I have a hundred million images scattered on my computer and I need to quickly see them, nothing like a good script to herd them in a plain txt file and piping it to irfanview! No fidgeting with sixels, bat, or any other gui application. Hands down the fastest way… IMHO.

feh is very fast as well. But it is only a viewer and does not edit. But under Linux it is my go-to viewer, also for cases like the one you describe.

Re: IrfanView

#119
IrfanView shouldn’t be seen as a relic just because it’s “old”. Software like IV, Opus/Far just highlight how inadequate the OS provided tools for common navigation/viewing patterns are. Anyone who breaks through the “the computer is a magical box and I don’t understand any of it” barrier needs to have a manual tossed at them that covers this software right away. Nevermind gdb/WinDbg.

Re: IrfanView

#120

I've been using IrfanView since at least 1997, if not earlier in 1996. I still use IrfanView to this day. It's my Swiss knife for a lot of simple photo editing work (cropping, resizing, padding, text-adding, etc), batch-processing, and for browsing single photos through directories. It's not just good, it's way faster than the bloated alternatives. To top it off, IrfanView works beautifully on my Linux via Wine, and…

You want to open a picture, FAST, no matter the format or resolution ?

You want to open a picture and then move from one picture to the next in the same folder with arrow keys or mouse scroll, again fast and without loading or menus fonctions or whatever ?

You want to batch process a folder to convert all files to png with the larger side limited to 2000px, keep the location data but reset the orientation data, and remove the original file only if conversion succeeded ?

You want to scan something, rotate it and lossy pixelize an area ?

You want to resize, convert, re-encode a picture from one format to another with tonnes of option without resorting to command line because you're on windows and you would like to just do it in the same app you use for every photo thing ?

You want to cut a part of a picture, or identify the pixel color on a picture, or dozens or other every day operations like that ?

You want all of that to be absurdly fast, aka instant, without any complex menu or dozens of clicks to get where you need ?

I've been using irfanview since the beginning too, and it's not for lack of trying other stuff, it's just so much better. It's for me one of those tools, like Everything or Ditto or SumatraPDF or 7zip or NAPS2 or ... That just get what they are and what they should provide, and do just that, and do it right.

Post reply on HN