As it feels relevant, here's a site of mine that includes all the HTTP Status Codes in an easy referenceable format: http://httpstatus.es/
http://httpcats.heroku.com/
Pretty RFC
71–76 of 76 posts
Re: Pretty RFC
#72Interesting. I thought I wanted something like this, but the problem with RFCs is the archaic writing style. It's hard to understand the details of a low-level network protocol when you also have to remember their redefinitions of words like SHOULD, MUST, MAY, MIGHT, PERHAPS, QUITE POSSIBLY and sort through ASCII art that is split across multiple pages. (The standards are also excessively wordy and poorly organized.…
I'll take the RFC format (short, to the point and really clear) over others any day.
Most of the times I feel as though those that write specs have received explicit instructions to make things as verbose as possible to justify the insane pricing of standards documents.
Archaic in this case is just another word for continuity and that's not a bad thing. Imagine every RFC hopping on to the latest bandwagon in terms of presentation, powerpoints, pdfs, html animated images and so on. It would be a cacophony, now it is just the minimal amount of information required to implement something. It's great in a minimalist way.
Re: Pretty RFC
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
This comment has no place at the top of the page. > the problem with RFCs is the archaic writing style I'll admit, reading standards is more difficult than reading regular prose, it is nearly impossible to use language precisely without getting too verbose. Languages, and English especially, are full of little ambiguities; even simple words like "or" have more than one meaning! This doesn't quite cut it when it comes…
Let's take a look. Oxford says "should" implies "used to indicate obligation, duty, or correctness"[0]. That sure does not sound like "aren't required to" to me. Sure enough, if you look into "must" [1] you see that it is defined as "be obliged to; should". Maybe you shouldn't be chiding people implying how simple English is when you're not so solid on it yourself, especially when you've given a whole treatise in you…
It's right there in the first couple of sections, usually.
Re: Pretty RFC
#74Re: Pretty RFC
#75As it feels relevant, here's a site of mine that includes all the HTTP Status Codes in an easy referenceable format: http://httpstatus.es/