1–10 of 16 posts
Or how else are we going to send secure messages in the future?
Show HN: I made a binary enigma machine for manual encryption
makerworld.com
"Or how else are we going to send secure messages in the future?"
And you could probably also market it as quantum secure, you know, there probably can't be a bitflip due to cosmic radiation .. (isn't this what quantum computers are doing? /s)
"it's the perfect blend of simplicity and security for modern communication" "experience encryption like never before!"
My very first (self choosen) real software project in school was a simulated replica of the Enigma, but it is of course way cooler, to have something that you can print out to actually physically put together. "Or how else are we going to send secure messages in the future?" And you could probably also market it as quantum secure, you know, there probably can't be a bitflip due to cosmic radiation .. (isn't this what…
Methods of attack on such machines are known, but not widely; moreover the amount of work required is likely to be large.
to
Methods of attack on such machines are widely known, thus crypt provides minimal security.
That's an intriguing comment. What do you mean by that? Do you mean a future when governments force tech companies to install backdoors in all end-to-end encrypted software we use? Or when AGI writes all of our software, designs all hardware, and AGI decides that it needs to monitor all human communications. Only half joking.