OpenShift by Red Hat
101–110 of 118 posts
Re: OpenShift by Red Hat
#102I tried openshift a few months ago for Rails. A real pain in the butt. They dont have simple deploy like Heroku. Even heroku can be time consuming in the beginning to get right, openshift was even more complicated. It may work better for Java I don't know, looks like they are right on the bleeding edge with support for Ruby 1.8.7.
Our roadmap has more support for newer versions of Ruby coming soon. We started with the base packages in RHEL but are now working to also bring newer versions as standard cartridges. That said, you can also use a DIY cartridge to get Ruby 1.9.x
On the other hand, though, I think you should have probably started with the 1.9.2/1.9.3 series rather than the ancient 1.8.7.
Re: OpenShift by Red Hat
#103Why all PaaS providers (Heroku, CF, OpenShift) building their CLI tools using Ruby? Are they copying Heroku? Maybe because Python used for OS itself? What dotCloud uses?
Re: OpenShift by Red Hat
#104Couldn't get their client software to work on Ubuntu. Even followed a few tutorials. I think I'm missing something, but haven't a bunch of time to invest.
I like these instructions: http://www.stylesen.org/openshift_client_tools_installation_...
Thanks!
Re: OpenShift by Red Hat
#105How does it compare to CloudFoundry? Aside from having official PHP support, that is.
Disclaimer: I work at AppFog and contributed to the initial version of PHP support for the CloudFoundry open source project at https://github.com/cloudfoundry.
Re: OpenShift by Red Hat
#106How does it compare to CloudFoundry? Aside from having official PHP support, that is.
Re: OpenShift by Red Hat
#107I don't like this "Free" business. It doesn't make sense and the complete lack of pricing info really puts me off. So I play around with this, like it and choose to stick with it. They then introduce uncompetitive pricing.. I just wasted my time. They do not need to give exact pricing - they might not know at the moment - but they should at least give an overview of what they plan to do. > We will keep this free plan…
Not sure where the second statement came from but if you can let me know the source, I can correct it. I can represent OpenShift fairly well. We will always have a free level of service and we are trying very hard to keep what is free today, free forever. We have tweaked a couple of things based on user feedback but the goal is to have a meaningful free offering. At the same time, we are getting constant feedback tha…
How are you keeping the free plan going now though? Who's paying for it? RedHat doesn't exactly strike me as the kind of company that's wallowing in spare cash.
Re: OpenShift by Red Hat
#108Couldn't get their client software to work on Ubuntu. Even followed a few tutorials. I think I'm missing something, but haven't a bunch of time to invest.
I like these instructions: http://www.stylesen.org/openshift_client_tools_installation_...
Re: OpenShift by Red Hat
#109rhc domain status -l I get an error about ~/.ssh/config not existing. I added my ssh key via the web interface and have no idea what's going on here.
In looking at the User Guide, I find it gets me no where. http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/OpenShift/2.0/html/User_Gu...
The relevant message here is:
"If your system fails any of the tests, make a note of the error message and consult the relevant section of the OpenShift User Guide for further information."
Nothing like a circular reference that leads to nowhere.
Re: OpenShift by Red Hat
#110The documentation is frankly awful. For example, when getting the status: rhc domain status -l I get an error about ~/.ssh/config not existing. I added my ssh key via the web interface and have no idea what's going on here. In looking at the User Guide, I find it gets me no where. http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/OpenShift/2.0/html/User_Gu... The relevant message here is: "If your system fails any of the tests, make…