Live data from Hacker News

Paris preserves its mixed society by pouring billions into public housing

nytimes.com

651–660 of 662 posts

Re: Paris preserves its mixed society by pouring billions into public housing

#651

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> American culture doesn't like to think about how much of "success" is down to luck Think it's more surprising how little of it is down to luck. Even working slightly harder reaps rewards quickly that outweigh the extra work. It's most just most people are not even putting in the minimum.

Luck controls the biggest swings in some cases, but diligent hard work covers for quite a bit of the small changes. Some people are just really bad at diligent hard work and lack the self control needed. The question is how to handle that without causing other issues.

Why do you think they're like that? Whether it's nature or nurture, doesn't luck still play a significant role in what nature or nurture they received?

Re: Paris preserves its mixed society by pouring billions into public housing

#652

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That would be a definitional matter. About 15% of Paris’s population are non-nationals. This isn’t unusual for a European capital; Dublin is 17% and Berlin is 22%, say. This would have been lower two centuries ago, though what it meant to be a national was arguably a bit different. However, what’s a ‘Frenchman’? Two centuries ago, most of France did not speak French fluently (and perhaps did not speak it at all). Eve…

> About 15% of Paris’s population are non-nationals. How would you possibly know this as France doesn't record ethnic data for births?

Non-nationals are, approximately, non-citizens. Outside of edge-cases, anyone born in a country may be presumed to be a national of that country.

Re: Paris preserves its mixed society by pouring billions into public housing

#653

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In France? How when the top tax rate is 45%?

That's only income tax. There's also social contributions including pension, health insurance, and unemployment insurance. This adds up to around an extra 20% tax (although pension contributions are capped so could be less for very high salaries).

Also, VAT

Re: Paris preserves its mixed society by pouring billions into public housing

#654

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're ranting incoherently. Americans give the most to non-religious organizations and charities by a wide margin (both individuals, corporations, and the government). For instance, the US government allocates $7 billion+ annually to the UN World Food Programme [1]. The next biggest donor? $1.7 billion. It's not even close. And no, $150 million in claimed charitable giving in 2020 is provably false. One ultra-rich i…

Giving 7 billion to a food programme is irrelevant when you have policies that enslave Global South to monocropping and force them to import your exports with IP laws (GE seeds) or when you have protectionist subsidies (as U.S. notoriously does) that makes your own exports not competitive. The harm of U.S. policy to the aid recipients is far in excess of 7 billion+, as you claim here.

Of course, it’s always the US’s fault. The Global South won’t take responsibility for electing buffoons as leaders that continually ruin their economies.

Rule no 1 - always blame others.

Re: Paris preserves its mixed society by pouring billions into public housing

#655

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Massive quantities of evidence exist demonstrating that human beings have at least some capacity to believe that they have concern for the well being of other humans. Prime example: do you remember that big pandemic a few years ago? Do you remember how passionate most people were that everyone should go get their vaccinations, to protect each other? I sincerely think that these people genuinely believed that the feel…

The charitable impulse in municipal housing politics gets you a cluster of tiny trailer homes on a parking lot surrounded by a 8 foot fence in an industrial part of town far away. Maybe, if you are feeling especially magnanimous, a servant’s outbuilding in the shadow of your house. It’s not in human nature to give charity that would elevate others to the same or, God forbid, higher status as compared to the benefacto…

I totally agree with you. But then, consider how different it would be if:

a) we had a political system that was capable of enacting the will of the people

b) we had an education system that improved people so they were capable of making more optimal decisions

Re: Paris preserves its mixed society by pouring billions into public housing

#656
post #426

Earlier quoted context omitted.

yeah, make sure you move out of the city and go run hiding in the countryside somewhere if you stay in the city, the globalists WILL come for you, they WILL put you in 15 minute cities where everything you need is easily available within walking, bicycling or high quality transit distance (oh no!)

Lol. I'm not worried. I just it's funny think it's funny how people live to line up on the side of the unelected global governance system and think that voting matters and believe everything they were taught in school/on TV etc. "I'm choosing to give up my car, and you will choose that too!"

The mayor enjoys high levels of public approval for her pedestrianisation and cyclability projects (and so do dozens of other aediles undertaking similar projects in the past few years throughout Europe), so I'm not sure what's your point here.

I also can't really figure out the logic of a conspiracy theory that equates "car (purchase + license + insurance + fuel) = freedom" and "bikes (300$ + strong legs) = slavery", but hey

Re: Paris preserves its mixed society by pouring billions into public housing

#657

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, some actions have bad outcomes and some good. Are you saying everything the government does objectively makes life worse? Then you should be furious about driving anyway, because the government effectively forced you into it.

Yes. I think government was acting immorally back then, far exceeding whatever people required and acting in support of powerful interests (petrol companies, industry). Now it is far, far worse, with government seeking a level of micro management and control over people that is abhorrent to me - control of travel, energy, water, money, location, etc. And amazingly, most people want it! Because they have been mis-educ…

Kindly explain how "not having 90% of public surface area in a dense city dedicated to 1 mode of transport, the automobile" is tyranny. If anything the elimination of everything else as a mode of transport (by not having safe paths for people walking or cycling, as well as subpar public transport) is the true tyranny here.

It's true what they say: for those accustomed to privilege anything else is an assault.

Re: Paris preserves its mixed society by pouring billions into public housing

#658

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This is like saying "a person typically travels at 30MPH". It doesn't mean anything. No. It's very different. It's more like saying "a person is usually about 5'7"." It is obvious there are difference, but it's not something that varies minute by minute, and the range of differences is not stated. There's definitely not cars moving 40+ mph without making a lot of tire noise. You're right those aren't good citations…

> There's definitely not cars moving 40+ mph without making a lot of tire noise. Based on what? A car with low resistance tires on concrete isn't going to make a lot of tire noise even at fairly high speeds. > But seriously, can you find a single study saying wind is a dominant factor in road noise? The one lumping tire noise and aerodynamic noise together is obviously contemplating that aerodynamic noise is a thing.…

> Road noise for most modern cars at city speeds isn't loud.

If you can hear it and you're not next to the road, that's too loud. It's noise pollution. You can personally draw an arbitrary line anywhere you want to determine what counts as "loud", but the actual phenomenon is that cars make an amount of noise that is detrimental to our health, sanity, and wildlife.

Re: Paris preserves its mixed society by pouring billions into public housing

#659

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With all respect, “didn’t see a car for hours on a typically busy midtown avenue”, even during peak covid, is bananas if for no other reason than the ambulances were going almost constantly (ymmv based on where you live). But I distinctly remember watching the odd car here and there and wondering where they were going. And things were quieter! There was the background noise of machinery and buses and cars but it was…

Living in Texas and Manhattan you should aware that we very good at adapting to our surroundings. The relative noise is not comparable between rural Texas and Manhattan. I agree the city was quieter during covid, and would be quieter without cars. It's ridiculous to debate otherwise. But a major is vastly noisier without cars than any normal suburb with the rare car passing by a residential street. NYC will always be…

I was just pointing out that the idea that one could go for “hours” without seeing a car is essentially impossible in Manhattan, even during Covid.

Re: Paris preserves its mixed society by pouring billions into public housing

#660

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure, but it is also true that food that is healthy for people is an absurdly expensive form of energy compared to gasoline.

If we make free the largest costs of gas, greenhouse gas emissions.

Even if we count the cost of the co2 emissions: it probably takes more petroleum products to grow the food for the walking delivery workers than it takes to fuel the delivery truck.
Post reply on HN